How the Protestant Reformers are Still Changing the World

Category: History (Page 5 of 6)

Athanasius: Diligent Defender of the Deity of Christ

The Ancient Library of Alexandria, Egypt–Athanasius studied here as a young man

Written by Dr. Marcus J. Serven

“For in him the whole fullness of deity dwells bodily.” Colossians 2:9

“Jesus Christ is the same yesterday and today and forever.” Hebrews 13:5

Jehovah’s Witnesses at the door

Many Christians have had the awkward experience of innocently answering a knock at their front door only to find “doorstep debaters” eager to challenge their beliefs about Jesus Christ. This is not a new situation. The well-known Christian author C. S. Lewis once said, “There are no new heresies.” This simple truth can be confirmed by searching back in Church history and finding that for every modern-day heresy there is an ancient “parent” cult. The early Christians also had to defend themselves from the aggressive tactics of cult groups. Athanasius (A.D. c.296-373) was one such defender of the full deity and full humanity of Jesus Christ. In Christian history he is often referred to as one of the “Giants” of the Early Church because he stubbornly refused to allow the Church to adopt false teachings about the Lord Jesus Christ.

Born to wealthy Egyptian parents in Alexandria, he was trained in all the disciplines of classical Greek learning. Although Athanasius was physically small, he possessed a keen intellect with an aptitude for serious study and determined debate. The Christian school in Alexandria was world-renown for its wonderful library. This unique collection of aged parchments and manuscripts was considered by many to be one of the “Seven Wonders of the Ancient World.” In this scholarly environment young Athanasius quickly showed his academic and spiritual abilities. He was also fascinated by the Christian hermits who had removed themselves from the city. These men sought solitude in the Egyptian desert so that they could totally concentrate on God. His personal conversion can be traced to the winsome evangelical influence of these devoted monks. Even as a young man, Athanasius became well-known as a respected Bible teacher. Moreover, he served as a faithful deacon in the local Church, and he was a trusted theological advisor to the Alexandrian Bishop, Alexander (A.D. c.250-326).

Athanasius

In the year A.D. 325 Athanasius traveled across the Mediterranean Sea to the Council of Nicea (near Constantinople) along with Bishop Alexander. Athanasius served as the Bishop’s personal secretary and aide. This council, which was called by Emperor Constantine (A.D. c.272-337), focused on resolving two nagging conflicts that raged within the Empire: (1) the disagreement between Christians about whether those who had fearfully rejected Christ during the persecutions could be forgiven (i.e. the Melitian Schism); and (2) the heterodox preaching of false teachers who denied the full deity of Jesus Christ (i.e. the Arian Heresy). This second dispute, which was far less emotionally charged than the rift concerning unforgiven brethren, was actually much more serious because of its long-range effect on the foundational doctrines of the Church. The essential question was this: “Who is Jesus Christ?” If the Ancient Church answered that question by denying the full deity of Christ, its basic understanding of many of the precious doctrines of the Bible would be distorted; specifically, the doctrine of Creation, the Trinity, the incarnation of Christ, the redemption of sinners by Christ on the Cross, and the bodily Resurrection of Jesus Christ. The Council of Nicea, therefore, was a crucial turning-point in the history of the Church. Out of its scholarly dialogue and intense debates would emerge a champion to give future leadership and direction to orthodox Christianity. The man of the hour whom God raised up was twenty-nine year old Athanasius—short, swarthy, and scholarly.

In contrast, the opponent of Athanasius was the tall, handsome, and eloquent Arius (A.D. 256-336). He served as an Elder (or Presbyter) within a local Alexandrian congregation. He was well-known in the community as a person who loved debate, and who entered into disputes about theology. One day after hearing Bishop Alexander teach at a local Synod on the reasonableness of the Trinity, Arius contentiously put forward the argument that Jesus Christ was not divine but only God’s first created creature. By teaching this view Arius declared that Jesus was not the eternally begotten Son of God, but that he was created in time like an angel or a human being. He wrote to a sympathetic friend contrasting the teaching of Bishop Alexander with his own views concerning the person of Jesus Christ. Arius contended, 

…how grievously the bishop attacks us and persecutes us, and comes full tilt against us, so that he drives us from the city as atheists because we do not concur with him when he publicly preaches, “God always, the Son always; at the same time the Father, at the same time the Son; the Son co-exists with God, un-begotten; he is ever-begotten, he is not born-by-begetting; neither by thought nor by any moment of time does God precede the Son; God always, Son always, the Son exists from God himself.” … To these impieties we cannot even listen, even though the heretics threaten us with a thousand deaths … We are persecuted because we say that the Son has a beginning, but God is without beginning. For that reason we are persecuted, and because we say that he is from what is not. And this we say because he is neither part of God nor derived from any substance. For this we are persecuted; the rest you know.

Bettenson, Documents of the Christian Church, “The Letter of Arius to Eusebius, Bishop of Nicomedia,” 41-42) 

Thus, the Arians came to believe that Jesus Christ was “a little god” not having the same essential nature, or substance, as God the Father. In this way they denied the deity of Christ and greatly disturbed the Church. The Emperor, Constantine, was not happy with the bitter controversy that ensued and he found it necessary to call an ecumenical council of the whole Church which convened on May 20, 325 at Nicea (near Constantinople in Asia Minor).

Many leaders within the Ancient Church followed Arius because of the close connection that his teachings had with Greek philosophy and religion. Within the Greek pantheon there were many “lesser gods” who did the bidding of the “highest God.” Also, in Greek thought it was assumed that all flesh is evil and all that is spiritual is holy. Therefore, the Arians reasoned that Jesus Christ could not be fully human and fully divine at the same time. Since he was only a created being he could not possibly be called the Creator, nor could he fully satisfy God’s divine justice when he died on the Cross, neither could he experience a bodily resurrection on the third day. In order to promote his “false gospel” amongst the common people Arius rewrote many popular songs from the taverns and seaports by altering their words. He used the same tunes, but changed the lyrics. This strategy was highly successful and many orthodox Christians leaders despaired that the whole Christian world was becoming followers of Arius.

The Council of Nicea (A.D. 325)

When the Council of Nicea finally met in A.D. 325 the outcome was far from certain. Three hundred Bishops and a large number of Church representatives attended from all across the Empire. Among the delegates were followers of Bishop Alexander (Trinitarians), semi-Arians (who held to a middle view of the subordination of the Son to the Father), and a small but vocal group of Arians (with Arius also present). After Emperor Constantine began the proceedings extensive debate followed with Eusebius of Caesarea (a semi-Arian) putting forth a creedal statement as a basis for compromise. After several changes and refinements the Council overwhelmingly concluded that Jesus Christ was of the “same nature” as God the Father (homoousias), rather than being of a “like nature” to God the Father (homoiousias). The Nicene Creed that was forged out of this rigorous debate affirmed that Jesus Christ, the eternal Son of God, was coequal, consubstantial, and coeternal with the Father. Although Arianism was officially rebuked at the Council of Nicea, and Arius was exiled, this smooth-talking heretic continued to find willing adherents within the Church for many years to come.

A short time after Athanasius returned from Nicea he was thrust into leadership as the new Bishop of Alexandria. His long-time mentor and close friend, Bishop Alexander, died an untimely death in A.D. 326 and the thirty year old Athanasius became his successor. When no one else was willing to defend the deity of Christ, Athanasius resolutely held fast to the Nicene formulation. His friends referred to his dogged defense by coining the phrase, Athanasius: Contra Mundum (or, “Athanasius: Against the World”). He was severely put to the test in the 330’s when Arius treacherously signed the Nicene Creed, after making a few private additions to it (e.g. he changed homoousias to homoiousias). As a result, Emperor Constantine ordered Athanasius to readmit Arius to the Lord’s Table. But, Athanasius stubbornly refused! For this he was condemned at the Synod of Tyre (A.D. 335) and exiled to the desert. For the next thirty years Athanasius was restored and exiled four different times! It was during one of these forced exiles in the wilderness that Athanasius befriended the reclusive monk, Anthony (A.D. 251-356). He became widely known for writing the compelling biography, The Life of Saint Anthony, which details the victories and challenges of the spiritual life of the reclusive desert hermit. 

Finally, Athanasius brought some level of resolution to the controversy focused on the deity of Christ with his brilliant treatise The Incarnation of the Word. He wrote, 

We were the cause of his becoming flesh. For our salvation he loved us so much as to appear and be born in a human body … No one else but the Savior himself, who in the beginning made everything out of nothing, could bring the corrupted to incorruption; no one else but the Image of the Father could recreate men in God’s image; no one else but our Lord Jesus Christ, who is Life itself, could make the mortal immortal; no one else but the Word, who orders everything and is alone the true and only-begotten Son of the Father, could teach men about the Father and destroy idolatry. Since the debt owed by all had to be paid (for all men had to die), he came among us. After he had demonstrated his deity by his works, he offered his sacrifice on behalf of all and surrendered his temple [i.e. his body] to death in the place of all men. He did this to free men from the guilt of the first sin and to prove himself more powerful than death, showing his own body incorruptible, as a first-fruit of the resurrection of all … Two miracles happened at once: the death of all men was accomplished in the Lord’s body, and death and corruption were destroyed because of the Word who was united with it. By death immortality has reached all and by the Word becoming man the universal providence and its creator and leader, the very Word of God, has been made known. For he became human that we might become divine; he revealed himself in a body that we might understand the unseen Father; he endured men’s insults that we might inherit immortality.

Athanasius, The Incarnation of the Word 4.20.54

This powerful tract and several others brought Athanasius into better favor with the Emperor and gave a clear set of arguments with which to combat Arianism. It was, however, not until after Athanasius’s death (A.D. 373) that Arianism was finally defeated at the Council of Constantinople (A.D. 381). It was here that the followers of Athanasius formulated the doctrine of the hypostasis which is based on Hebrews 1:3 and the Greek word hypostasis meaning “substance,” “nature,” and “being.” Therefore, the orthodox position regarding the doctrine of the Trinity is the following—“one essence in three hypostases” (mia ousia, treis hypostaseis).

The Council of Chalcedon (A.D. 451)

At a subsequent ecumenical gathering, the Council of Chalcedon in A.D. 451, it was further affirmed that the two natures of Jesus Christ are understood as a Hypostatic Union. In other words, Jesus Christ is fully God and fully man at the same time (cf. John 1:1-3, 14, 18; Colossians 2:9; Hebrews 1:1-8). The final summary of the teachings of Athanasius are to be found in the Athanasian Creed which was not actually written by Athanasius, but by one who followed his teachings in the sixth century. As a result of his efforts the error of Arianism was finally defeated, but unfortunately it was not totally eradicated. To this day the erroneous teachings of the heretic Arius are embodied in the beliefs of the modern-day Jehovah’s Witnesses and various other individuals who have departed from the truth. 

Louis Berkhof, the well-regarded Reformed systematic theologian, gives us the following summary of the doctrine of the deity of Jesus Christ. He carefully explains, 

The Council of Nicea declared the Son to be co-essential with the Father (A.D. 325), while the Council of Constantinople (381 A.D.) asserted the deity of the Holy Spirit, though not with the same precision. As to the interrelation of the three it was officially professed that the Son is generated by the Father, and that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son…In this one Divine Being there are three Persons or individual substances, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. This is proved by the various passages referred to as substantiating the doctrine of the Trinity. To denote these distinctions in the Godhead, Greek writers generally employed the term hupostasis, while Latin authors used persona, and sometimes substantia…Consequently many preferred to speak of three hypostases in God, three different modes, not of manifestation as Sabellius taught, but of existence or subsistence…The whole undivided essence of God belongs equally to each of the three persons. This means that the divine essence is not divided among the three persons, but is wholly with all its perfection in each one of the persons, so that they have numerical unity of essence…There are certain personal attributes by which the three persons are distinguished…Though they are all works of the three persons jointly, creation is ascribed primarily to the Father, redemption to the Son, and sanctification to the Holy Spirit. This order of the divine operations points back to the essential order in God and forms the basis for what is known as the economic Trinity.”

Berkhof, Systematic Theology, 82-83, 87-89

Summary statements regarding the doctrine of the deity of Jesus Christ can be found in the great ecumenical creeds as well as in creeds from the time of the Reformation. For example, the Nicene Creed (A.D. 325), the Council of Chalcedon (A.D. 451), the Athanasian Creed (A.D. c.500), and the Westminster Confession of Faith (A.D. 1647) all contain statements supporting the full deity and humanity of Jesus Christ. Sections from each of these historic creeds can be found in the Appendices that follow.   

*     *     *     *     *     *     *     *     *     *

Appendix A  

The Nicene Creed

(Adopted in A.D. 325 and revised in A.D. 381)

We believe in one God, the Father All-sovereign, maker of heaven and earth, of all things visible and invisible; 

And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only-begotten [monogene] Son of God, Begotten of the Father before all the ages, God of God, Light of Light, true God of true God, begotten not made, of one substance with the Father [homoousian to patri], through whom all things were made; who for us men and for our salvation came down from heaven, and was made flesh of the Holy Spirit and the virgin Mary, and became man, and was crucified for us under Pontius Pilate, and suffered and was buried, and rose again on the third day according to the Scriptures, and ascended into the heavens, and sitteth on the right hand of the Father, and cometh again with glory to judge the living and the dead,  of whose kingdom there shall be no end: 

And in the Holy Spirit, the Lord and Life-giver, that proceedeth from the Father [and the Son], who with the Father and the Son is worshipped together and glorified together, who spake by the prophets: 

In one holy Catholic and Apostolic Church: we acknowledge one baptism unto remission of sins. We look for a resurrection of the dead, and the life of the age to come. 

(Source: Henry Bettenson, Documents of the Christian Church, 27-28)

*     *     *     *     *     *     *     *     *     *

Appendix B

The Council of Chalcedon

(Adopted in A.D. 451)

Therefore, following the holy Fathers, we all with one accord teach men to acknowledge one and the same Son, our Lord Jesus Christ, at once complete in Godhead and complete in manhood, truly God and truly man, consisting also of a reasonable soul and body; of one substance [homoousios] with the Father as regards his Godhead, and at the same time of one substance [homoousios] with us as regards his manhood; like us in all respects, apart from sin; as regards his Godhead, begotten of the Father before the ages, but yet as regards his manhood begotten, for us men and for our salvation, of Mary the Virgin, the God-bearer [Theotokos]; one and the same Christ, Son, Lord, Only-begotten [monogene], recognized in two natures [en duo phusesin; i.e. The Hypostatic Union], without confusion, without change, without division, without separation; the distinction of natures being in no way annulled by the union, but rather the characteristics of each nature being preserved and coming together to form one person [prosopon] and subsistence [hypostasis], not as parted or separated into two persons, but one and the same Son and Only begotten God the Word, Lord Jesus Christ; even as the prophets from earliest times spoke of him, and our Lord Jesus Christ himself taught us, and the creed of the Fathers has handed down to us.

(Source: Henry Bettenson, Documents of the Christian Church, 54-55)

*     *     *     *     *     *     *     *     *     *

Appendix C 

The Athanasian Creed

(Written by followers of Athanasius’ teachings in A.D. c.500)

  1. Whosoever will be saved: before all things it is necessary that he hold the Catholic Faith. 
  2. Which Faith except every one do keep whole and undefiled: without doubt he shall perish everlastingly. 
  3. And the Catholic Faith is this: That we worship one God in Trinity, and Trinity in Unity; 
  4. Neither confounding the Persons: nor dividing the Substance [Essence].
  5. For there is one Person of the Father: another of the Son: and another of the Holy Ghost. 
  6. But the Godhead of the Father, of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost, is all one: the Glory equal, the Majesty coeternal. 
  7. Such as the Father is; such is the Son: and such is the Holy Ghost.
  8. The Father uncreated: the Son uncreated: and the Holy Ghost uncreated. 
  9. The Father incomprehensible [unlimited]: the Son incomprehensible [unlimited]: and the Holy Ghost incomprehensible [unlimited, or infinite]. 
  10. The Father eternal: the Son eternal: and the Holy Ghost eternal. 
  11. And yet they are not three eternals, but one eternal. 
  12. As also there are not three uncreated: nor three incomprehensible [infinites], but one uncreated: and one incomprehensible [infinite]. 
  13. So likewise the Father is Almighty: the Son Almighty: and the Holy Ghost almighty. 
  14. And yet they are not three Almighties: but one Almighty. 
  15. So the Father is God: the Son is God: and the Holy Ghost is God.
  16. And yet they are not three Gods: but one God.
  17. So likewise the Father is Lord: the Son Lord: and the Holy Ghost Lord.
  18. And yet not three Lords: but one Lord. 
  19. For like as we are compelled by the Christian verity: to acknowledge every Person by himself to be God and Lord:
  20. So are we forbidden by the Catholic Religion: to say, There be [are] three Gods, or three Lords.
  21. The Father is made of none: neither created, nor begotten. 
  22. The Son is of the Father alone: not made, nor created: but begotten. 
  23. The Holy Ghost is of the Father and of the Son: neither make, nor created, nor begotten: but proceeding.
  24. So there is one Father, not three Fathers: one Son, not three Sons: one Holy Ghost, not three Holy Ghosts. 
  25. And in this Trinity none is afore, or after another: none is greater, or less than another [there is nothing before, or after: nothing greater or less]. 
  26. But the whole three Persons are coeternal, and coequal.
  27. So that is all things, as aforesaid: the Unity in Trinity, and the Trinity in Unity, is to be worshipped.
  28. He therefore that will be saved, must [let him] thus think of the Trinity.   

 (Source: Philip Schaff, The Creeds of Christendom, Vol. 2, 66-68)

*     *     *     *     *     *     *     *     *      *

Appendix D

The Westminster Confession of Faith (1647)

Regarding the Doctrine of the Trinity: 

Chapter 2, “Of God, and of the Holy Trinity”  

Article 3. In the unity of the Godhead there be three persons, of one substance, power, and eternity: God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Ghost: the Father is of none, neither begotten, nor proceeding; the Son is eternally begotten of the Father; the Holy Ghost eternally proceeding from the Father and the Son. 

Regarding the Person of Jesus Christ: 

Chapter 8, “Of Christ the Mediator”

Article 1. The Son of God, the second person in the Trinity, being very and eternal God, of one substance and equal with the Father, did, when the fullness of time was come, take upon Him man’s nature, with all the essential properties and common infirmities thereof, yet without sin: being conceived by the power of the Holy Ghost, in the womb of the virgin Mary, of her substance. So that two whole, perfect, and distinct natures, the Godhead and manhood, were inseparably joined together in one person, without conversion, composition, or confusion. Which person is very God, and very man, yet one Christ, the only Mediator between God and man. 

Article 2. The Lord Jesus, in His human nature thus united to the divine, was sanctified and anointed with the Holy Spirit, above measure, having in Him all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge; in whom it pleased the Father that all fullness should dwell; to the end that, being holy, harmless, and undefiled, full of grace and truth, He might be thoroughly furnished to execute the office of a mediator and surety. Which office He took not unto Himself, but was thereunto called by His Father, who put all power and judgment into His hand, and gave Him commandment to execute the same.

(Source: Orthodox Presbyterian Church, “Westminster Confession of Faith,” 12, 34-37)

*     *     *     *     *     *     *     *     *      *

Select Bibliography:  

Berkhof, Louis. Systematic Theology. 4th Edition. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1941. 

Bettenson, Henry, and Chris Maunder, eds. Documents of the Christian Church. 4th Edition. London, UK: Oxford University Press, 2011.

Carr, Simonetta. Athanasius. From the series: “Christian Biographies for Young Readers.” Grand Rapids, MI: Reformation Heritage Books, 2011.

Eusebius, Pamphilus. Ecclesiastical History. Christian F. Cruse, trans. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, Reprint 1992. See the Appendix: “A Historical View of the Council of Nice,” by Rev. Isaac Boyle. 

Christy-Murray, David. A History of Heresy. London, England: Oxford University Press, 1976.

Douglas, J. D. ed. New International Dictionary of the Christian Church. Revised Edition. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House, 1978.

Douglas, J. D. ed. Who’s Who in Christian History. Wheaton, IL: Tyndale House Publishers, 1992.

Dowley, Timothy ed. The History of Christianity. Revised Edition. Oxford, England: Lion Publishers, 1990.

Elwell, Walter A., ed. Evangelical Dictionary of Theology. 2nd Edition. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 2001.

  • “Alexandrian Theology,” by Paul Woolley
  • “Antiochene Theology,” by Paul Woolley
  • “Athanasius,” by John F. Johnson
  • “Athanasian Creed,” by John F. Johnson
  • “Arianism,” by Victor L. Walter
  • “Cappadocian Fathers,” by Victor L. Walter 
  • “Chalcedon, Council of,” by J. H. Hall
  • “Christology,” by Ronald S. Wallace
  • “Constantinople, Council of,” by Craig A. Blaising
  • “Communication of Attributes, Communicatio Idiomatum,” by J. M. Drickamer 
  • “Creeds,” by Geoffrey W. Bromiley
  • “Cults,” by Irving Hexham
  • “Firstborn,” by David H. Wallace 
  • “Heresy,” by M. R. Farrer
  • “Homoousion,” by Craig A. Blaising
  • “Hypostasis,” by W. E. Ward
  • “Hypostatic Union,” by Craig A. Blaising
  • “Incarnation,” by Robert L. Reymond
  • “Jehovah’s Witnesses,” by Irving Hexham
  • “Jesus Christ,” by R. H. Stein 
  • “Logos,” A. F. Walls
  • “Melitian Schisms,” by Craig A. Blaising
  • “Monarchianism,” by Craig A. Blaising
  • “Nicea, Council of,” by Craig A. Blaising
  • “Only Begotten,” by Everett F. Harrison
  • “Orthodoxy,” by J. I. Packer
  • “Paul of Samosata,” by Gary T. Burke
  • “Perichoresis,” by Stephen M. Smith
  • “Socinus, Faustus,” by P. Kubricht
  • “Subordinationism,” by Richard C. Kroeger & Catharine C. Kroeger
  • “Substance,” by Gary T. Burke
  • “Trinity,” by Geoffrey W. Bromiley
  • “Unitarianism,” by C. Gregg Singer
  • “Word, Word of God, Word of the Lord,” by H. D. McDonald  

Houghton, S. M. Sketches from Church History. Carlisle, PA: The Banner of Truth  Trust, 1980.

Kelly, J. N. D. Early Christian Doctrines. 2nd Edition. New York, NY: Harper and Row Publishers, 1960.

Lane, Tony. Exploring Christian Thought. Revised Edition. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson Publishers, 2006. 

Latourette, Kenneth Scott. A History of Christianity. Volume 1. Revised Edition. New York, NY: Harper and Row Publishers, 1975.

Noll, Mark A. Turning Points: Decisive Moments in the History of Christianity. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 1997. 

Robertson, Archibald, ed. St. Athanasius: Select Writings and Letters. Volume IV. Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. Originally published 1891, Reprint 1998. 

Schaaf, Philip. The Creeds of Christendom. Volume 2. 6th Edition. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, Reprint 1998.

Woodbridge, John D., ed. Great Leaders of the Christian Church. Chicago, IL: Moody Press, 1988.

Dr. Marcus J. Serven, ThM and DMin

The Genevan Foundation – Copyright 2020 – All Rights Reserved

Patrick: Missionary-Evangelist to Pagan Ireland

The lush and verdant countryside of Ireland takes my breath away–it is so beautiful!

Written by Dr. Marcus J. Serven

Patrick – Missionary Evangelist to Ireland

Patrick (A.D. c.390-c.461), a young man raised by loving Christian parents, was thoroughly acquainted with the Bible and the evangelical faith. He was also greatly influenced towards faith in Christ by an old family friend by the name of Julias, who had been a slave in Ireland many years before. One day when Patrick was sixteen years old, he was out working on his Father’s farm and became aware of a disturbance on the beach near his house. He could tell something was going on by the loud cries of the sea gulls. Upon further investigation he discovered that “sea raiders” from Ireland had invaded the English coast and were preparing to attack the nearby village of Banavem.  Knowing that he should warn his Father and Mother who were in the village Patrick tried to slip away undetected, but in his haste slipped and fell down the cliff overlooking the beach. As he tumbled downwards, he hit his head on a boulder and landed unconscious at the feet of the Irish leader. They tied him up in their boat and kidnapped him! Much later, when Patrick awakened he realized that he would probably never see his parents or England again. He put himself in God’s providential care. However, God did not leave him all alone for Julius, his Father’s friend, had also been captured in the battle for Banavem. By God’s grace they were able to stay together in captivity.

Patrick as a Shepherd

For six long years Patrick (sometimes known by the name, Maewyn Succat) served as a shepherd to an Irish chieftain by the name of Michlu (a Druid priest). He learned the language (Gaelic) and the local customs of the Irish, but he refused to worship the false deities of the Druid religion. Strangely, the Druid Priests had widely prophesied that a man from over the sea would come amongst them. He would humble the leaders of the land and lead the people to the Great God. The Druids greatly feared this man, yet they also acknowledged that he would cause them to take up “shepherd’s staffs” in submission to the Lord and end their war-like ways. Patrick often wondered who this man might be, but he never dreamed that he was the very man! Julius in the meantime discipled him, as he would his own son, teaching him the doctrines of the Bible. Patrick said of this time, “The Lord opened to me the sense of my unbelief that I might remember my sins and that I might return with my whole heart to the Lord my God.” It was during these formative years that Patrick matured in his own faith and in his desire to communicate the Gospel to the Irish people. His first interested listeners were the three children of Michlu: Gussacht, Emer, and Bronach.  After six years, Patrick escaped with Julias to France and eventually returned home to England. He believed that God had called him to become a minister of the gospel and he was ordained. During his studies he experienced an intense desire to return to Ireland and evangelize his former captors. He once even had a dream when he heard a voice calling to him in Gaelic saying “Holy Boy, we beseech you to come and walk among us once more.” 

The ruins of an ancient Celtic Church in the Irish countryside

Patrick finally returned to Ireland in A.D. 432, when he was 43 years old, and spent the next thirty years laboring there. He was appointed a missionary Bishop over that pagan land and risked his life many times in order to further the gospel. He had special ties to several of the chieftains and established many monasteries and preaching points throughout the land. He is the object of many legends and spurious tales, but none of these take away from the real man of God that he truly was. During his extended ministry he established thirty churches and baptized over 120,000 persons. How do we evaluate the ministry of Patrick? Merle d’Aubigne makes this learned assessment. He writes,

Succat, afterwards known as St. Patrick…returned to Ireland…ever active, prompt, and ingenious, he collected the pagan tribes in the fields by the beat of drum, and then narrated to them in their own tongue the history of the Son of God. Erelong his simple recitals exercised a divine power over their rude hearts, and many souls were converted, not by external sacraments or by the worship of images, but by the preaching of the Word of God. The son of a chieftain, whom Patrick calls Benignus, learnt from him to proclaim the Gospel, and was destined to succeed him. The court bard, Dubrach MacValubair, no longer sang druidical hymns, but canticles addressed to Jesus Christ. Patrick was not entirely free from the errors of the time; perhaps he believed in pious miracles; but generally speaking we meet with nothing but the gospel in the earlier days of the British church.

Merle d’Augbigne, The Reformation in England, Vol. 1, 28-29

The legacy of Patrick continues to survive today due many legends of dubious quality and his recognition as a “Saint” by the Roman Catholic Church. Thankfully, Patrick himself leaves an autobiographical book, The Confessions of Patrick, and a powerful poem entitled, The Breastplate of Patrick. The words of his poem give some idea of Patrick’s immense courage and unflagging resolve in facing down the wicked Druids. He placed his faith in “the strong name of the Trinity” and trusted that God would providentially protect him from “all Satan’s spells and wiles.” The Lord did not fail him, and he significantly blessed the ministry of this missionary-evangelist to Ireland. It is good for us to remember, that what others meant for evil (his kidnapping and enslavement), God meant for good (his knowledge of Ireland’s language and his love for the Irish people). Let us, then, rejoice in the life and ministry of Patrick and give thanks to God for the powerful gospel we proclaim!

The Breastplate of Patrick

I bind unto myself today the strong name of the Trinity, by invocation of the same, the Three in One, and One in Three.

I bind this day to me forever, by power of faith, Christ’s incarnation; His baptism in the Jordan river; His death on the cross for my salvation. His bursting from the spiced tomb; His riding up the heav’nly way; His coming at the day of doom; I bind unto myself today.

I bind unto myself today the power of God to hold and lead, His eye to watch, His might to stay, His ear to hearken to my need; The wisdom of my God to teach, His hand to guide, His shield to ward, The word of God to give me speech, His heav’nly host to be my guard.

Against all Satan’s spells and wiles, against false words of heresy, against the knowledge that defiles, against the heart’s idolatry, against the wizard’s evil craft, against the death-wound and the burning, the choking wave, the poison’d shaft, protect me, Christ, till Thy returning.

Christ be with me, Christ within me, Christ behind me, Christ before me, Christ beside me, Christ to win me, Christ to comfort and restore me, Christ beneath me, Christ above me, Christ in quiet, Christ in danger, Christ in hearts of all that love me, Christ in mouth of friend and stranger.

I bind unto myself the name, the strong name of the Trinity, by invocation of the same, the Three in One, and the One in Three, of whom all nature hath creation, Eternal Father, Spirit, Word, Praise to the Lord of my salvation: Salvation is of Christ the Lord.

“Patrick’s Breastplate” Translated by C. F. Alexander in Eerdman’s Handbook to The History of Christianity, 212

Resources for Further Study:

A Celtic Cross

d’Aubigne, Merle J. H. The Reformation in England. S. M. Houghton, ed. Volume 1. Edinburgh, Scotland: The Banner of Truth Trust, 1962.

Cahill, Thomas. How the Irish Saved Civilization. New York, NY: Anchor Books, 1995. 

Christian History Magazine. Vol. XVII, No. 4, Issue 60. “How the Irish Were Saved: The Culture & Faith of Celtic Christians.”

Douglas, J. D., ed. The New International Dictionary of the Christian Church. Revised Edition. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House, 1978.

  • “Celtic Church” by Robert G. Clouse
  • “Ireland” by Adam Loughridge
  • “Ireland, Church of” by Adam Loughridge
  • “Missions, Christian” by Ian Breward
  • “Ninian” by J. D. Douglas
  • “Patrick of Ireland” by Hugh J. Blair

Douglas, J. D., ed. Who’s Who in Christian History. Wheaton, IL: Tyndale Publishers, 1992.

Dowley, Tim, ed. Eerdman’s Handbook to The History of Christianity. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1977.

“Patrick’s Confessions and Breastplate” in Great Christian Classics. Kevin Swanson, ed. Parker, CO: Generations With Vision, 2010.

Neill, Stephen. A History of Christian Missions. Second Edition. New York, NY: Penguin books, 1986.

Olsen, Ted. Christianity and the Celts. Downers Grove, Il: InterVarsity Press, 2003 

Reynolds, Quentin. The Life of Saint Patrick. New York, NY: Random House, 1955.

Wace, Henry and William Piercy, eds. A Dictionary of Christian Biography. London, England: John Murray, 1911; Reprint, Peabody, MA: Hendricksen Publishers, 1994. 

Woodbridge, John D. Great Leaders of the Christian Church. Chicago, IL: Moody Press, 1988.

Dr. Marcus J. Serven, ThM and DMin

The Genevan Foundation – Copyright 2012 – All Rights Preserved

Time Line of Key Events in the Life of Dr. Martin Luther:

Martin Luther posts the 95 Theses on the Castle Church door in Wittenberg, Germany

Written by Dr. Marcus J. Serven

Who was Martin Luther? Certainly he must be remembered as that preeminent Protestant Reformer who recovered the true Gospel and rescued the Christian Church from its slavery to the “traditions of men.” He began his religious career as a well-meaning, but misguided Augustinian monk. God had endowed him with a remarkably curious mind that searched after truth–not just philosophical truth, but “true truth” that would actually make a difference in changing lives. He found that “true truth” in the pages of Holy Scripture. There he learned that all men and women are inveterate sinners who are unable to help themselves. He also learned that God had graciously sent forth his Son, Jesus Christ, as a sacrifice for sins, and that he had also provided the “gift of faith” so that we could believe and trust in the work of Jesus Christ. This discovery brought about a fundamental change in Luther’s life so that he shed his guilt, was justified on the basis of Christ’s righteousness, and dedicated himself to live to the glory of God. The Lord used him to begin a spiritual revolution in Germany, which spread throughout Europe and (in time) to the rest of the world. Dr. Hugh Thomson Kerr, Jr., a notable scholar of the Reformation, wrote this following tribute:

There is virtual unanimity among historians and theologians as to the unique importance and significance of Martin Luther. He was not only the outstanding hero of the Protestant Reformation, but his influence was such that subsequent history cannot be understood without taking him into consideration. Even those who do not subscribe to his views are forced to admit that he brought about a transformation, if not a reformation, in life and thought as well as in religion…Surely he is one of the pivotal personalities of history, and he has always been acknowledged as such. His appeal is universal, and if books about him mean anything he grows in importance with the passing years. That is why he belongs not to one branch of Protestantism, but, we may say, to Christian theology.

Dr. Hugh T. Kerr, A Compend of Luther’s Theology, “Forward”

Hence we study the life of Martin Luther, not because he was a greater and wiser man than the rest of us, but because he was an earthy and ordinary man, whom God used to accomplish extraordinary deeds for the kingdom of God. And for this one fact, we can all be thankful! Soli Deo Gloria!

His Early Years & Preparation: (1483-1501)

  • 1483 – Martin Luther is born on November 10th in Eisleben
  • 1483 – Luther is baptized on November 11th at the church in Eisleben
  • 1484 – Hans Luther moves his family to Mansfield, where he takes up work as a silver miner
  • 1492 – Young Martin (age 9) is enrolled in the Latin School of Mansfield
  • 1497 – Luther (age 14) attends the Latin School of Magdeburg run by the “Brethren of the Common Life”
  • 1498 – Luther attends the School of St. George in Eisenach. While “singing for his supper” he is befriended by the Cotta and Schalbe families 

In Erfurt: Life as a Student & Monk (1501-1511)

Luther as a Monk
  • 1501 – Luther (age 18) graduates from the School of St. George in Eisenach and begins studies at the University of Erfurt
  • 1502 – The Bachelor of Arts degree is awarded in September (30th out of 57 graduates)
  • 1505 – The Master of Arts degree is awarded in January (2nd out of 17 graduates) 
  • 1505 – At the encouragement of his father, Hans Luther, Martin Luther begins legal studies at the University of Erfurt in May
  • 1505 – On a journey home Luther (age 21) is caught in a severe thunderstorm near Stotternheim (July 2); he impulsively vows to become monk and enters the Augustinian cloister at Erfurt (July 17); his friends are unsuccessful in urging him to reconsider his decision
  • 1507 – Martin Luther’s Ordination and 1st Mass take place (April 3); his father, Hans Luther, rides in with twenty of his friends  and makes a sizable gift
  • 1509 – Luther is awarded two theological degrees: Biblical Baccalaureate and the Sententiarius in March
  • 1510 – Luther is sent to Rome on business for the Observant Augustinians
  • 1511 – Returned from Rome, Luther is transferred by his superior, Johann von Staupitz, to Wittenberg so that he can teach Bible in the University

In Wittenberg: His 1st Tower Experience (1511-1521) 

Philip Melanchthon – Martin Luther’s friend and fellow professor
  • 1512 – His Doctor of Theology degree is awarded at Wittenberg on October 19 
  • 1513 – He begins lectures on the Psalms during the Fall and realizes that the “righteousness of God” is a gift from God imputed to every believer (cf. Psalm 31:1 “…in Thy righteousness deliver me.”)  
  • 1514 – He begins lectures on Romans during the Spring, and confirms in his 1st Tower experience the thesis that the “righteousness of God” is graciously given through Christ to every believer (cf. Romans 1:16-17 “…For in it [the gospel] the righteousness of God is revealed from faith to faith.”)
  • 1515 – He begins lectures on Galatians during the Fall 
  • 1516 – He begins lectures on Hebrews during the Fall 
  • 1517 – Luther posts the 95 Theses on the door of the Castle Church at Wittenberg in opposition to the selling of Indulgences [i.e. certificates of pardon] by Johann Tetzel on October 31st
  • 1518 – Luther participates in the Heidelberg Disputation before his fellow Augustinians on April 26th
  • 1518 – Luther travels to Augsburg and argues theology with Cardinal Cajetan (October 12-14)
  • 1519  – Luther participates in the Leipzig Debate with Johann Eck of Ingolstadt
  • 1520 – Two German Knights, Ulrich Von Hutten and Franz Von Sickingen, offer Luther armed protection in the face of rising opposition to his theology
  • 1520 – Luther writes On the Papacy at Rome (June 11th)
  • 1520 – On June 15th Pope Leo X issues a papal bull, Exsurge Domine, giving Luther sixty days to recant and submit to the Pope’s authority
  • 1520 – Luther writes Address to the Christian Nobility of the German Nation (in August)
  • 1520 – Luther writes The Babylonian Captivity of the Church (October 6)
  • 1520 – Luther writes On the Freedom of a Christian (November)
  • 1520 – The burning of the Exsurge Domine and books of canon law takes place in a public bonfire at Wittenberg (December); Luther appears and throws the offending documents into the fire to the cheering of the students

At Worms: His 2nd Tower Experience (1521)

  • 1521 – Luther is excommunicated by Pope Leo X (January 3)
  • 1521 – Luther is summoned by Holy Roman Emperor Charles V to the Diet of Worms; “safe passage” is promised (March)
  • 1521 – On April 16-18 Luther is questioned in two hearings at the Diet of Worms
  • 1521 – During an anxious night of prayer Luther has a 2nd Tower experience, delivering his famous words the next morning, “…I am bound by the Scriptures I have quoted, and my conscience is captive to the Word of God. I cannot do otherwise, here I stand, may God help me, Amen.”
Luther appears before the Diet of Worms (1521)

In the Wartburg: Life as an Outlaw (1521- 1522)

The Wartburg Castle
  • 1521 – Luther is “kidnapped” by friends and kept in protective custody in the Wartburg Castle (early May)
  • 1521 – Luther grows a beard and goes by the name of “Junker Jorg” 
  • 1521 – Luther writes Commentary on the Magnificat (May)
  • 1521 – Luther writes On Confession: Whether the Pope Has the Authority to Require It (June 1)
  • 1521 – Luther writes Against Latomus (June 20)
  • 1521 – Luther writes On the Abolition of Private Masses: On Monastic Vows (November)
  • 1521 – Luther writes An Admonition to All Christians to Guard Themselves Against Insurrection (December) 
  • 1521 – Luther begins his translation of the New Testament into German using The Greek New Testament by Erasmus (1516 edition)  

Return to Wittenberg: Mid-Career (1522-1530)

Katie Luther
  • 1522 – Luther suddenly returns to Wittenberg on March 6
  • 1522 – Luther writes Advent Church Postils (March) 
  • 1522 – Luther publishes his translation of the New Testament in German (September) 
  • 1523 – Luther writes That Jesus Christ was Born a Jew
  • 1523 – Luther writes On Temporal Authority: The Extent to Which It Should be Obeyed (March)
  • 1524 – Luther writes Letter to the Princes of Saxony Concerning the Rebellious Spirit
  • 1524 – Luther writes To the Municipalities of Germany…On Founding Schools (February) 
  • 1524 – Luther argues with a fellow reformer, Andreas Carlstadt, on the nature and practice of the Lord’s Supper
  • 1524 – Erasmus publishes his On the Freedom of the Will (September) 
  • 1524 – On October 9 Luther publicly abandons his religious habit
  • 1524 – Luther writes To the Christians at Strasbourg against the Enthusiasts (November)
  • 1525 – Luther writes Against the Heavenly Prophets (January)
  • 1525 – Luther writes Admonition to Peace Concerning the 12 Articles of the Peasants (April 19) 
  • 1525 – Due to the Peasant’s Revolt Luther writes Against the Murderous and Thieving Hordes of Peasants (May 5)
  • 1525 – On June 13 Luther marries the former nun, Katharina von Bora
  • 1525 – Luther explains his previous pamphlets by writing An Open Letter against the Hard Book against the Peasants (July)
  • 1525 – Luther’s reply to Erasmus, On the Bondage of the Will, is published (December)
  • 1526 – The 1st of six children is born—Johannes Luther (June 7)
  • 1526 – Luther writes German Mass and Order for Public Worship
  • 1527 – Luther writes Whether These Words, “This Is My Body” Still Stand against the Fanatics (April)
  • 1527 – The 1st of four Diets at Speyer takes place. The result is that the German princes refuse to enforce the Edict of the Diet of Worms to stop the spread of Lutheranism (mid-summer) 
  • 1527 – Luther writes Whether One May Flee from a Deadly Plague (November) 
  • 1527 – His 2nd child ,Elisabeth Luther, is born on December 10; sadly she dies on August 3, 1528 at 8 months
  • 1528 – Luther writes Great Confession on the Lord’s Supper (March)
  • 1528 – During a lengthy period of physical illness and spiritual depression—which he called Anfectungen (i.e. spiritual darkness, doubt, dread)—Luther composes his great hymn, “A Mighty Fortress is Our God” (August) 
  • 1529 – Luther writes On War Against the Turk
  • 1529 – Luther begins writing The Small Catechism and The Large Catechism
  • 1529 – His 3rd child Magdalena Luther (“Lenchen”) is born (dies at age 13) 
  • 1529 – The Marburg Colloquy takes place with a heated debate with the Swiss Reformer, Ulrich Zwingli, over the Lord’s Supper (October 1-4)
  • 1530 – Luther stays in the Coburg Castle during the Diet of Augsburg (April to August); Philip Melanchthon represents his theological views
  • 1530 – Luther writes To the Clergy Assembled at Augsburg (mid-May)
  • 1530 – Meetings begin at Schmalkalden resulting in a defensive alignment of German Princes against Roman Catholic incursions; this alliance becomes known as the Schmalkald League
Family Life: Martin Luther leading hymns with his Wife, Children, and Philip Melanchthon

In Wittenberg: Consolidation of the Church (1530-1546)

  • 1531 – Students begin to copy down Luther’s remarks during meals (Table Talk
  • 1531 – Luther’s 4th child, Martin, is born 
  • 1531 – Luther writes Warning to His Beloved Germans (April)  
  • 1531 – Luther writes Commentary on Galatians (May)
  • 1531 – Luther writes On Infiltrating and Clandestine Preachers (January) 
  • 1533 – Luther’s 5th child, Paul, is born 
  • 1533 – Luther writes About Private Mass and Ordination
  • 1534 – Luther’s translation of the complete German Bible (Old and New Testaments) is published
  • 1534 – His 6th child, Margaret, is born (December 17th)
  • 1535 – Luther writes Lectures on Genesis
  • 1536 – The Wittenburg Concord on the Lord’s Supper takes place (May)
  • 1537 – The Schmalkald Articles are adopted by Protestant Princes (February)
  • 1538 – Luther writes Letter Against the Sabbatarians (March)
  • 1539 – The bigamy of Philip of Hesse becomes public; this results in a stormy and lengthy controversy about one of Luther’s most ardent supporters
  • 1540 – The Colloquy of Hagenau takes place (June-July)—Philip Melanchthon represents Luther
  • 1541 – The Diet of Regensburg takes place (April)—Philip Melanchthon represents Luther 
  • 1542 – The death of Magdalena Luther (“Lenchen”) on September 20 
  • 1543 – Luther writes On the Jews and Their Lies (January) 
  • 1544 – Luther writes Short Confession on the Holy Sacrament (September) 
  • 1545 – Luther writes Against the Papacy at Rome, Founded by the Devil (March) 
  • 1546 – On February 18th Martin Luther dies in the town of his birth and baptism, Eisleben
  • 1546 – On February 22nd Luther’s funeral is held at Wittenberg with a sermon preached by his closest friend and supporter, Philip Melanchthon
Some of my favorite books on Martin Luther
Here are four more recent Luther volumes–all of them are winners!

Resources for Further Study: 

Althaus, Paul. The Theology of Martin Luther. Robert C. Schultz, trans. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press, 1966.

Bainton, Roland. Here I Stand. New York, NY: Penguin Books, 1950.

Barrett, Michael, ed. Reformation Theology: A Systematic Summary. Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2017. 

Bornkamm, Heinrich. Luther in Mid-Career (1521-1530). Karen Bornkamm, ed. E. Theodore Bachman, trans. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press, 1983. 

George, Timothy. Theology of the Reformers. Revised Edition. Nashville, TN: B&H Academic, 2013.

Kerr, Jr., Hugh Thomson, ed. A Compend of Luther’s Theology. Philadelphia, PA: The Westminster Press, 1953.

Kittleson, James M. Luther the Reformer: The Story of the Man and his Career. Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg Publishing House, 1986. 

Kolb, Robert. Martin Luther as Prophet, Teacher, and Hero: Images of the Reformer 1520-1620. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 1999.

Kolb, Robert. Martin Luther and the Enduring Word of God. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2016. 

Lawson, Steven J. The Heroic Boldness of Martin Luther. Orlando, FL: Reformation Trust Publishing, 2013. 

Luther, Martin. Martin Luther: The Best from All His Works. Stephen Rost, ed. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson Publishers, 1989.

McGrath, Allister E. Christianity’s Dangerous Idea: The Protestant Revolution. New York, NY: Harper Collins Publishers, 2007. 

McGrath, Allister E. Luther’s Theology of the Cross: Martin Luther’s Theological Breakthrough. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 1985.

Nichols, Stephen J. Beyond the 95 Theses: Martin Luther’s Life, Thought, and Lasting Legacy. Phillipsburg, NJ: P&R Publishing, 2016. 

Oberman, Heiko O. Luther: Man Between God and the Devil. New York, NY: Image Books, 1992. 

Pettegree, Andrew. Brand Luther. New York, NY: Penguin Press, 2016. 

Plass, Ewald M. This is Luther: A Character Study. St. Louis, MO: Concordia Publishing House, 1948

Plass, Ewald M. What Luther Says: A Practical In-Home Anthology for the Active Christian. St. Louis, MO: Concordia Publishing House, 1959.

Rupp, Gordon. Luther’s Progress to the Diet of Worms 1521. London, England: SCM Press, 1951.

Sproul, R. C. and Stephen J. Nichols, eds. The Legacy of Luther. Orlando, FL: Reformation Trust Publishing, 2016. 

Steinmetz, David C. Luther in Context. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1995. 

Trueman, Carl R. Luther on the Christian Life. Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2015. 

Watson, Philip S. Let God be God: An Interpretation of the Theology of Martin Luther. London, England: The Epworth Press, 1947. 

Dr. Marcus J. Serven, ThM and DMin

The Genevan Foundation – Copyright 2020 – All Rights Reserved

A Heart Offered to God: The Life and Ministry of John Calvin

Written by Dr. Marcus Serven

“The sacrifices of God are a broken spirit; a broken and contrite heart, O God, you will not despise.” (Psalm 51:17)

John Calvin

Mention the name “John Calvin” in a crowd and oftentimes it will elicit remarks of contempt on the one extreme and deep admiration on the other. Simply stated, some people “abhor” him while others “adore” him! Such is the variety of responses to this complex and multi-talented man who served God during the Protestant Reformation (c.1517-1650). John Calvin (1509-1564) was clearly second in rank only to Martin Luther (1483-1546) during this crucial era. Traceable to Calvin and the church in Geneva are several unique and distinguishing aspects of Protestantism: the development and popularization of expository preaching, the Reformed view of the Lord’s Supper, the practice of home visitation by the elders, an extensive organization of social welfare, a comprehensive pattern of church discipline, and representative church government. Moreover, it is to Calvin that the modern church owes a great debt for developing with precision a number of key Christian doctrines: sovereign election and predestination, the providence of God, the penal-substitutionary view of the atonement, the mystical union that we enjoy with Christ, and the spiritual presence of Christ at the Lord’s Supper. Unfortunately, some people today consider Calvin’s theological system as rigid and uninspiring as an austere legal document. This is an unfair charge, for Calvin, like many of the Reformers, has been harshly reinterpreted by others. When one actually reads Calvin’s writings in his Bible Commentaries or from the Institutes of the Christian Religion, the warmth and piety that flows from Calvin’s prose stands in sharp contrast to the cold characterizations presented by his critics. Consider these colorful comments from the young reformer regarding the purpose of the Bible, a definition of faith, and the responsibilities of pastoral ministry,

Just as old or bleary-eyed men and those with weak vision, if you thrust before them a most beautiful volume, even if they recognize it to be some sort of writing, yet can scarcely construe two words, but with the aid of spectacles will begin to read distinctly; so Scripture, gathering up otherwise confused knowledge of God in our minds, having dispersed our dullness, clearly shows us the true God. 

John Calvin,Institutes 1:6:1

Now, the knowledge of God’s goodness will not be held very important unless it makes us rely on that goodness. Consequently, understanding mixed with doubt is to be excluded, as it is not in firm agreement, but in conflict, with itself. Yet far indeed is the mind of man, blind and darkened as it is, from penetrating and attaining even to perception of the will of God! And the heart, too, wavering as it is in perpetual hesitation, is far from resting secure in that conviction! Therefore our mind must be otherwise illumined and our heart strengthened, that the Word of God may obtain full faith among us. Now we shall possess a right definition of faith if we call it a firm and certain knowledge of God’s benevolence towards us, founded upon the truth of the freely given promise in Christ, both revealed to our minds and sealed upon our hearts through the Holy Spirit. 

John Calvin, Institutes 3:2:7

Christ did not ordain pastors on the principle that they only teach the Church in a general way on the public platform, but that they care for the individual sheep, bring back the wandering and scattered to the fold, bind up the broken and crippled, heal the sick, support the frail and weak.

John Calvin,Commentary on Acts 20:20

In such passages as these we witness a depth of biblical understanding, a theological precision, and an evangelical zeal for the things of God.

Jean Cauvin was born at Noyon in northern France on July 10, 1509. He was the second of six children. Physically, he possessed a slight frame, he stood approximately five feet six inches tall, his face was etched with sharp Gaelic features, and his head was crowned by black hair. His father, Gerard Cauvin, served as the financial secretary and notary for the Bishop of Noyon. While his mother, Jeanne Lefranc, was a woman of quiet piety who sought to raise all of her children to be faithful to the practices and doctrines of the Roman Catholic Church. Sadly, before his fourth birthday John’s mother died. The exact reasons for her death are unknown although it may have been that she died while giving birth to his younger brother Antione. After a brief period of grieving his father remarried, but it appears that this new mother had little lasting influence in shaping John’s life; that was a role primarily dominated by his father. Recognizing his second son’s keen intellectual gifts Gerard purposed that John should get a quality education and pursue the priesthood. He reasoned that this was the way to both earthly and eternal prosperity. Utilizing his many high connections Gerard arranged for John’s enrollment in a local preparatory school, the College des Capettes.

College de La Marche, part of the University of Paris

Having distinguished himself academically, when Calvin was only fourteen years old he was sent off to Paris to attend the College de La Marche. This school was part of the burgeoning University of Paris and it was here that Calvin further developed his abilities in Latin and began to study theology. During the course of his studies with Mathurin Cordier, a well-known teacher of languages, he Latinized his name to “Johannes Calvinus” and in time he became known as “John Calvin.” It was a common practice of the day to finance the education of promising young students from the collection of offerings at a chapel near their homes. These were called “ecclesiastical benefices.” Calvin was no exception to this custom, and his father secured for him the offerings from the altar of Gesine and several other chapels as well. After a transfer to the College of Montaigu in 1525, which was also in Paris, Calvin continued his studies and was finally awarded his Bachelor of Arts degree. This notable achievement occurred early in 1528 when Calvin was just eighteen years old. Further studies in theology ensued, but these were interrupted when his father had a sudden falling-out with the local church authorities back in Noyon. As a result, Gerard Cauvin encouraged his son to move away from theology to the study of law. As an obedient son, he moved south and enrolled in the law program at the University of Orleans. Here he excelled in his studies, oftentimes serving as a substitute lecturer for absent professors. During this period Calvin associated himself with a group of fellow students who were beginning to question the teachings of the Roman Catholic Church. He was undoubtedly influenced by these earnest friends to develop a working knowledge of the Bible and to thoughtfully consider the gospel of Jesus Christ. At this point, though, his interest in spiritual matters was solely intellectual.

Calvin’s NT Greek Teacher

In 1529 Calvin transferred to the University of Bourges where he studied law under the fiery Italian jurist, Andrew Alciat. Calvin and his friends were not overly impressed with Alciat’s flamboyant style of teaching, and Calvin wrote a Preface for his friend’s pamphlet critiquing Alciat’s “acid tongue.” More importantly, while here in Bourges, he undertook the study of New Testament Greek from an enthusiastic and outspoken German instructor, Melchior Wolmar (1496-1561). Thus began for Calvin a life-long fascination with koine Greek and the New Testament. Theodore Beza (1519-1605), later Calvin’s close friend, confidant, and successor, also studied under Melchoir Wolmar. He happily noted,

I have the greater pleasure in mentioning his name, because he was my own teacher, and the only one I had from boyhood up to youth. His learning, piety, and other virtues, together with his admirable abilities as a teacher of youth, cannot be sufficiently praised. On his suggestion, and with his assistance, Calvin learned Greek. The recollection of the benefit which he thus received from Wolmar, he afterwards publicly testified by dedicating to him his Commentary on the First Epistle to the Corinthians.

Theodore Beza, Life of Calvin, 23-24

Moreover, it was under Wolmar’s diligent tutelage that Calvin began first to read the Early Church Fathers. As a result of this period of study a great foundation was laid for Calvin’s appreciation for the orthodox Christian faith and his excellent familiarity with the Church Fathers and Ancient Creeds. But had he become a true Christian? Not yet.

In 1531 Calvin’s father suddenly died. This untimely event released him from his father’s strict command to pursue law, and he quickly returned to Paris in order to indulge his growing interest in theology and biblical languages. It was in a Master of Arts program at the College de France he came under the evangelical influence of Jacques Lefevre d’Etaples (1455-1536). Here he undoubtedly read the controversial pamphlets of Martin Luther and was further stirred to consider the claims of the gospel upon his own life. He also began studying Hebrew under Francois Vatable and opened himself to the beautiful complexities of the Old Testament. Perhaps out of deference to his deceased father, or out of a desire to finish what he had already started, in 1532 Calvin briefly returned to the University of Orleans to finish his law studies. He was awarded a Juris Doctorate degree and was licensed to practice law. But what was his true spiritual condition—had he yet put his trust in Jesus Christ alone? No not at this time.

Calvin’s conversion is very difficult to pinpoint, primarily because he did not talk much about it. Besides his daily study of the Scriptures, and the solid academic influences of Wolmar, Lefevre, and Vatable, there was one additional influence; the growing number of martyr’s deaths. As the evangelical faith grew throughout France, the Roman Catholic Church responded with a brutal persecution of its adherents. It is likely that the horrible deaths Calvin witnessed in Orleans, Bourges, and Paris deeply affected the young mind of John Calvin. They planted a seed of doubt regarding the truth claims of the Roman Catholic Church, and this doubt grew until it resulted in his”sudden conversion” to the gospel. Consider this brief autobiographical passage from the Preface of his Commentary on the Psalms. Calvin candidly wrote these remarks in 1557,

When I was yet a very small boy, my father destined me for the study of theology. But afterwards, when he considered that the law commonly raised those who followed it to wealth, this prospect suddenly induced him to change his purpose. Thus it came to pass that I was withdrawn from the study of philosophy and set to the study of law. To this pursuit I endeavored faithfully to apply myself, in obedience to the will of my father. But God, by the secret guidance of His providence, at length gave a different direction to my course. And first, since I was too obstinately devoted to the superstitions of popery to be easily extricated from so profound an abyss of mire, God by sudden conversion subdued and brought my mind to a teachable frame, though I was more hardened in such matters than might have been expected from one at my early period of life. Having thus received some taste and knowledge of true godliness, I was immediately inflamed with so intense a desire to make progress therein, that I did not altogether leave off other studies, I yet pursued them with less ardor. 

John Calvin, Preface, Commentary on the Psalms, xl-xli

From this revealing testimony we see that his heart indeed became inflamed with the gospel message. He was profoundly changed by spiritual regeneration. And although he did not fully attach himself to the growing evangelical movement, he nonetheless firmly identified himself from this point on as a disciple of the Lord Jesus Christ.

After receiving his licensie es loix he returned to Paris as a practicing attorney, young Renaissance scholar, and budding teacher of the Bible. He tried his hand at writing and published his Commentary on Seneca’s Treatise on Clemency. This effort was not a success and only a few copies were sold. However, the future direction of his life took a surprising turn when he reconnected with Nicolas Cop, a family friend from Noyon. In God’s providence, he was the newly appointed Rector of the University of Paris. On November 1, 1533 Cop gave a stirring inaugural address to the assembled students and professors in the University Chapel. As a result, he was accused of heresy, not only for criticizing the Pope but for endorsing the works of Martin Luther. When Cop realized what great danger his life was in, he immediately fled the city. It was suspected by the church authorities that Calvin was the “ghost-writer” of Cop’s speech and they determined to arrest him as well. Calvin barely eluded their grasp as the police came to his lodgings late one evening. As they were pounding on his door he narrowly escaped out the second-story window while his friends lowered him down to the street on a rope made of bed sheets tied together. He fled into the night and sought refuge from Queen Margaret of Navarre (1492-1549), sister of the French King, who was sympathetic to the Protestant cause. Thus, the timid and mild-mannered Calvin could no longer safely consider his allegiance to the Reformers without personal commitment. His lot was permanently cast; he was now a fugitive and a member of the Protestant Reformation!

Calvin’s Motto and Seal

The persecution of Protestants in France became the order of the day during the reign of King Francis I (1494-1547). The French Protestants, called Huguenots, often met for worship at hidden locations during these purges. For a short time, Calvin actually pastored a small congregation in Poitiers that met secretly in a cave. His final separation from the Roman Catholic Church came in 1534 when he gave up all of his ecclesiastical benefices, since his conscience would not allow him to receive this money any longer. Thus, he became totally submissive to the Lord Jesus Christ. Calvin crafted his own personal motto during this time as a fugitive. He resolved to be Prompte et Sincere in Opere Domini (translated, “Prompt and sincere in the work of God”). In addition, he drew a personal seal that encompassed a flaming heart on an outstretched hand that was offered to God. These two insignias, the motto and seal, served him well for the rest of his life and became a fitting legacy to his sincere evangelical faith.

After clandestinely traveling throughout France from place to place he finally settled in Basel, Switzerland and began work on his Institutes of the Christian Religion (initially published in 1536). This short booklet comprised of six chapters went through five major revisions throughout Calvin’s life and expanded into its exhaustive form, eighty chapters in all, by the year 1559. John T. McNeill notes that the Institutes,

. . . holds a place in the short list of books that have notably affected the course of history, molding the beliefs and behavior of generations of mankind. Perhaps no other theological work has so consistently retained for four centuries a place on the reading list of studious Christians . . . It has, from time to time, called forth an extensive literature of controversy. It has been assailed as presenting a harsh, austere, intolerant Christianity and so perverting the gospel of Christ, and it has been admired and defended as an incomparable exposition of Scriptural truth and a bulwark of evangelical faith. Even in times when it was least esteemed, its influence remained potent in the life of active churches and in the habits of men. To many Christians whose worship was proscribed under hostile governments, this book has supplied the courage to endure. Wherever in the crises of history social foundations are shaken and men’s heart’s quail, the pages of this classic are searched with fresh respect. In our generation, when most theological writers are schooled in the use of methods, and of a terminology, widely differing from those employed by Calvin, this masterpiece continues to challenge intensive study, and contributes a reviving impulse to thinking in the areas of Christian doctrine and social duty. 

John t. McNeill, “Introduction” to the Institutes, xxix

In the Preface to the Institutes, Calvin dedicates his “little book” to King Francis I with the hope that the persecution of the Protestants would be eased. In God’s providence this was not to be, and the nurturing of the nascent Protestant movement would have to take place in other countries that would be more sympathetic to the cause.

Guillame Farel

In 1536 the twenty-eight year old Calvin was returning from a quick journey to Noyon in order to bring his brother Antoine and his sister Marie safely out of France. They were on their way to Strasbourg, but were providentially detoured to Geneva, Switzerland. The armies of Francis I were on maneuvers and Protestant reformers, especially those of Calvin’s notoriety, would want to avoid the King’s troops at all costs. This figured to be a turning point in his life for it was here in Geneva that he met the ardent Swiss reformer Guillame Farel (1489-1565) and was recruited to remain in Geneva to help with the reform of that troubled city. It was Calvin’s plan to stay only one night in Geneva, and so while eating dinner that evening at a local inn Calvin innocently remarked to Farel that he felt his place in life was to pursue a “quiet life of scholarship” in Strasbourg. Farel abruptly stood up—some have suggested that he actually jumped on the table sending all of the dishes clattering to the floor in a loud series of crashes!—and with fiery eyes flashing and red-beard wagging he angrily denounced Calvin with an accusing finger. He loudly shouted,

You are following your own wishes, and I declare, in the name of God Almighty, that if you do not assist us in this work of the Lord, the Lord will punish you for seeking your own interest rather than his.

Theodore Beza, Life of John Calvin, 29

God moved through Farel’s impassioned exhortation and from that point on Calvin’s ministry became inextricably tied to Geneva.

Idelette Calvin

The efforts at reform of Farel and Calvin were not always appreciated by the townspeople of Geneva. In 1537 it was planned that the population of the entire city would swear allegiance to a Protestant Statement of Faith, however, there was strong opposition and Geneva remained in a state of agitated unrest. Months later when Calvin and the other ministers of the city refused to reinstitute the Lord’s Supper to the townspeople, there was a revolt. Finally, in 1538 all three ministers, Farel, Calvin, and the aged Elie Coraud, were banished from the city altogether. Calvin fled to Strasbourg where he pastored a large congregation of French refugees and taught in Johann Sturm’s Bible Institute. While there, he married the widow Idelette de Bure and adopted her two children as his own. Life was not always easy in Strasbourg for his family. Even though Calvin served as a pastor, represented the city at international conferences, taught classes, wrote books, took in boarders, and served as a lawyer, he was so poor at times that he was forced to sell some of his precious reference books in order to put food on the table. Better times, though, were only a short season ahead.

Calvin as a young Pastor

In 1541 Calvin was miraculously called back to Geneva. At first he did not desire to return to the town that had so cruelly rejected him. However, with encouragement from Farel and several delegations from Geneva, he was persuaded that God would use him in bringing lasting change to the city. With his most antagonistic critics gone, through death or by exile, he settled down to a lifetime of productive work. On his first Sunday back in the pulpit at St. Pierre he gave no reproaches to the local population, he simply picked-up with the very next Bible passage from where he had left off two and half years prior. And so, he resumed his ministry of expositional preaching. The town council accepted his recommendation that every person should be governed by the moral law of the Bible. Laws were rewritten and codes of conduct were upheld by the local magistrates. On the personal side, John and Idelette took up residence at a home provided by the city (#11 Rue de Calvin). Here they enjoyed a small garden in the yard, entertained many guests, and carried on the work of the church. Only one child was born to John and Idelette, a boy names Jacques. He was born prematurely and died in infancy on July 28, 1542. Idelette herself, died after a brief illness on March 29, 1549. After several short years of marital happiness, Calvin was heart-broken but pressed forward with his busy schedule of church and civic responsibilities.

Some people have formed negative impressions of Calvin because of the controversies that surrounded his life and ministry. One such controversy erupted over the arrival in Geneva of the apostate Spanish physician Michael Servetus (1511-1553). Servetus had moved beyond his training in medicine to study theology, and had adopted a heretical view of the Trinity. If Servetus had kept his anti-Trinitarian thoughts to himself he would have occasioned no wrath from the church, however, he widely published his findings and actively entered into debate with the leading theologians of the day. The most capable of these theologians was, arguably, John Calvin. Years before, Servetus and Calvin had actually met in Paris where he challenged Calvin to debate the doctrine of the Trinity. Servetus earnestly hoped to win Calvin to this unorthodox position, but when the appointed hour came Servetus failed to show up for the debate. Calvin was ready at the proper location, at great personal risk to himself, but his detractor never came. In God’s providence these same two young men would meet nineteen years later in a another city by a different river to argue the same theological subject that were they unable to debate on that day in Paris.

During the intervening years, Servetus and Calvin corresponded by letter on several different occasions. Finally, Servetus secretly published his unorthodox book, Christianismi Restitutio, in Vienne where he was quickly discovered, put on trial by the Roman Catholic authorities, found guilty of heresy, and sentenced to death by burning. Before the sentence of death could be carried out he escaped from jail, and for an unknown reason he unwisely sought refuge in Protestant Geneva. In fact, Calvin had warned him previously by letter to not come to Geneva. But, when he did come, without hesitation Calvin filed a warrant for his arrest with the civil authorities.

Michael Servetus

It might be wondered by some Christians today as to why Calvin would seek to have Servetus arrested; after all wasn’t this just a theological dispute? It must be remembered that Geneva had declared itself a Protestant city in 1536, and there were still many citizens who resented the reform effort. They had organized themselves into a political party called the Libertines or the Enfants de Geneve. This conflict between doctrine and morals had raged on amongst the people of Geneva for many years and the Libertines sought to strategically enlist Servetus to their aide. One of their own, Philibert Berthelier, defended Servetus in his trial before the City Council. The Libertines reasoned, “If Calvin’s theology can be proven wrong, then he will be permanently removed from his position and thrown out of the city.” Calvin and his supporters were fully aware of this possibility. Moreover, the civil authorities and the church leaders were tied together much more closely in that day than in our own. Therefore an attack on any one of the doctrines that the city formally endorsed was an attack on the city itself. As a result, a stormy trial ensued that pitted the two opposing men against one another—Servetus versus Calvin and heterodoxy versus orthodoxy—with an outcome that resulted in Servetus’ condemnation by execution. Specifically, the City Council ordered that he was to be burned alive by a petite fur, a “small fire”. Although Servetus was a hardened and bitter critic of Calvin and his belief system, the zealous Reformer urgently appealed to the civil authorities for a more humane form of execution; but in this request Calvin was denied. In the end, he could only stand by and submit to the decree of the City Council. After a conciliatory visit to Servetus in his cell by Calvin, the earnest Farel accompanied Servetus to the place of his execution on Champel Square in Geneva. There was no repentance, and Servetus’ last words were consistent with the same heresies that he wrote about. He appealed to “Jesus, Son of the eternal God” to save his soul, rather than to “Jesus, the eternal Son of God”. In death he doggedly held to his heretical views.

Calvin visits Servetus in jail in an effort to introduce him to Jesus Christ, the eternal Son of God

To imply that Calvin was personally responsible for the death of Servetus would be stretching the truth. Servetus had already been sentenced to death by the Roman Catholic authorities in Vienne, and as to be expected he found no sympathy amongst the Protestants in Geneva. The magistrates of Geneva condemned him to death with the full approval of the neighboring Protestant cities; Basle, Berne, Schaffhausen, and Zurich. All four of these City Councils unanimously condemned Servetus for his heresies, yet left it up to Geneva to determine the appropriate means for putting him to death. In summary, consider this sober evaluation of Calvin’s actions in the Servetus affair by the preeminent Swiss Reformation historian, Merle D’Aubigne,

There are indeed, writers of eminence who charge this man of God with despotism; because he was the enemy of libertinage, he has been called the enemy of liberty. No body was more opposed than Calvin to that moral and social anarchy which threatened the sixteenth century, and which ruins every epoch unable to keep it under control. This bold struggle of Calvin’s is one of the greatest services he has done to liberty, which has no enemies more dangerous than immorality and disorder. Should this question be asked, “How ought infidelity to be arrested?” we must confess that Calvin was not before his age, which was unanimous, in every communion, for the application of the severest punishments. If a man is in error as regards the knowledge of God, it is to God alone that he must render an account. When men—and they are sometimes the best of men—make themselves the avengers of God, the conscience is startled, and religion hides her face. It was not so three centuries back, and the most eminent minds always pay in one manner or another their tribute to human weakness. And yet, on a well-known occasion, when a wretched man whose doctrines threatened society, stood before the civil tribunals of Geneva, there was but one voice in all Europe raised in favor of the prisoner; but one voice that prayed for some mitigation of Servetus’s punishment, and that voice was Calvin’s. 

Merle J. H. D’Aubigne, History of the Reformation in the Time of Calvin, Vol. 1, 5-6

Here we have a clear testimony to the humanity of Calvin and the on-going progress of personal liberty in the Western world that he started. In time, these individual freedoms would continue to grow and mature so that heirs of Calvin would enjoy their full expression. Hence, we should be thankful for the example of Geneva and Calvin.

Besides engaging in various theological disputes and controversies, Calvin had the personal joy of witnessing the completion of several long-term projects that benefited the church and the city of Geneva. In 1559 he completed the fifth edition of his highly-regarded Institutes of the Christian Religion; in 1560 he oversaw the publication of the Geneva Bible; and in 1562 he witnessed the publication of the Genevan Psalter. Taken in isolation each one of these is a notable achievement, but taken all together they are a stunning testimony of persistent and tenacious labor. Perhaps, one of Calvin’s greatest triumphs was the founding of the Genevan Academy in 1559 for the training of pastors and missionary evangelists. In a very short time four distinguished professors were recruited and an international student body was assembled. Remarkably, in a quarter of a century Geneva had become the center of the Protestant Reformation. John Knox (1514-1572), the courageous Scottish Reformer, wrote the following tribute about the city of Geneva in a personal letter to his friend, Mrs. Locke, in London,

In my heart I would have wished, yea and cannot cease to which, that it would please God to guide and conduct yourself to this place, where I neither fear nor shame to say is the most perfect school since the Apostles. In other places, I confess Christ to be truly preached; but manners and religion so sincerely reformed, I have not seen in any other place. 

Henry Sefton, John Knox: An Account of the Development of His Spirituality, 22

In brief, what system of theology did the students learn in Geneva from Calvin’s preaching, lectures, and books? They firmly held to the “Doctrines of Grace”, which are also known today as Reformed Theology. These beliefs can be summarized by the following popular acronym (i.e. Calvin’s “five points”),

T — Total Depravity or Total Inability (cf. Genesis 3:1-24, 6:1-8; Jeremiah 17:9-10; Mark 7:14-23; John 1:12-13; Romans 1:18-32, 3:9-18, 23, 6:23, 9:16). [In contrast to Human Ability, Pelagianism, and Semi- Pelagianism]

U — Unconditional Election (cf. Matthew 13:3-9, 18-23, 24-30, 36-43, 24:22, 24, 31; Ephesians 1:3-5, 2:8-9; Acts 13:48; Romans 8:29- 30, 33, 9:6-18; 2 Timothy 2:10). [In contrast to Conditional Election by Foreseen Faith]

L — Limited Atonement or Definite Atonement or Particular Redemption (cf. Isaiah 53:4-6; Jeremiah 31:31-34; Matthew 20:28; John 10:1-5, 11, 14- 15, 27-29). [In contrast to Universal Redemption, General Atonement, and Amyraldianism]

I — Irresistible Grace or Efficacious Grace (cf. John 11:43-44; Acts 9:1-19, 16:14; John 6:44, 10:1-5, 27; 1 Corinthians 2:14; 2 Corinthians 2:15-16).[In contrast to the Resistance of the Holy Spirit by Human Ability]

P — Perseverance of the Saints or Eternal Security (cf. Matthew 6:16-20, 24:13; John 3:3-8, 6:37, 39, 47, 10:27-29, 15:8; Romans 10:8-10; Ephesians 1:13-14; Philippians 1:6, 2:12-13; 1 Peter 1:3-5; 1 John 5:13). [In contrast to Falling from Grace, or Losing One’s Salvation]

As an enduring legacy, Calvin left behind written commentaries on twenty-four Old Testament books, and for every New Testament book of the Bible except 2 & 3 John , and the Book of Revelation. His theological magnum opus, the Institutes of the Christian Religion, made a significant impact on European culture and eventually to a majority of the Protestant churches scattered throughout the entire world. He preached daily and carried on a great correspondence keeping as many as four secretaries busy transcribing his words. Calvin’s health problems throughout his life were legion. He suffered prolonged afflictions of asthma, headaches, gout, gall stones, and various digestive difficulties. John Calvin finally succumbed to his illnesses on May 27, 1564 and died having lived 54 years, 10 months, and 17 days. His dying words were, “Thou, Lord, bruisest me; but I am abundantly satisfied since it is from Thy hand.” He was buried in an unmarked grave in the old cemetery of the Plain Palais in Geneva. Those who study his life wholeheartedly agree that he was “Prompt and sincere in the work of God” to the very end, and this faithful pastor, theological genius, and humble servant of Christ simply “burned-out” for God. Therefore, on the occasion of the 500th anniversary of John Calvin’s birth (July 10, 2009) let those of us who are his theological heirs enthusiastically affirm: Soli Deo Gloria!

Here are five of my all-time favorite books on John Calvin’s life and ministry
John Calvin’s signature

Select Bibliography:

Beza, Theodore. The Life of John Calvin. Edited and translated by Henry Beveridge, included in the Selected Works of John Calvin: Tracts and Letters. Volume 1. Originally published in Edinburgh by the Calvin Translation Society, 1844. Reprint, Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1983.

Calvin, John, Commentary on the Book of Psalms. Originally published in 1557. Reprint, Grand Rapids: Baker Books, 1998.

Calvin, John. Institutes of the Christian Religion. The Library of Christian Classics, vol. XXI. Edited by John T. McNeill and translated by Ford Lewis Battles. Philadelphia, PA: The Westminster Press, 1960.

Calvin, John. Selected Works of John Calvin: Tracts and Letters. 7 volumes. Co- edited by Henry Beveridge and Jules Bonnet. Originally published in Edinburgh by the Calvin Translation Society, 1851. Reprint, Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1983.

D’Aubigne, J. H. Merle. History of the Reformation in Europe in the Time of Calvin. Volumes 1-10. Originally published in 1863. Reprint, Harrisonburg, VA: Sprinkle Publications, 2000.

de Greef, Wulfert. The Writings of John Calvin: An Introductory Guide. 2nd Edition. Grand Rapids: Baker Books, 2008.

De Koster, Lester. Light for the City: Calvin’s Preaching, Source of Life and Liberty. Eerdmans, 2004.

George, Timothy. Theology of the Reformers. Nashville: The Broadman Press, 1988.

Hall, David W. A Heart Promptly Offered: The Revolutionary Leadership of John Calvin. Nashville, TN: Cumberland House, 2006.

Hughes, Philip E. ed. and trans. The Register of the Company of Pastors of Geneva in the Time of Calvin. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1966.

Hunter, A. Mitchell. The Teaching of Calvin: A Modern Interpretation. London: Maclehose, Jackson & Co., 1920. Reprint, Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock Publishers, 1999.

Kelly, Douglas F. The Emergence of Liberty in the Modern World: The Influence of Calvin on Five Governments. Phillipsburg, NJ: P&R Publishing, 1992.

Parker, T. H. L. John Calvin: A Biography. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1975.

McNeill, John T. The History and Character of Calvinism. London: Oxford University Press, 1954.

Reymond, Robert L. John Calvin: His Life and Influence. Ross-shire, Great Britain: Christian Focus Publications, 2004.

Sefton, Henry R. John Knox: An Account of the Development of His Spirituality. Edinburgh, Scotland: Saint Andrew Press, 1993.

Selderhuis, Herman J. John Calvin: A Pilgrim’s Life. Translated by Albert Gootjes. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2009.

Steel, David N., Curtis C. Thomas, and S. Lance Quinn. The Five Points of Calvinism: Defined, Defended, and Documented. Second Edition. Phillipsburg, NJ: P&R Publications, 2004.

Stickelberger, Emanuel. Calvin: A Life. London: James Clarke & Company, 1959.

Van Halsema, Thea B. This Was John Calvin. Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1959.

Vollmer, Philip. John Calvin: Man of the Millennium. Edited by Wesley Strackbein. San Antonio, TX: The Vision Forum, Inc. 2009.

Wallace, Ronald S. Calvin, Geneva, and the Reformation. Grand Rapids: Baker Books, 1990.

Walker, Williston. John Calvin: Organizer of Reformed Protestantism. New York: Schocken Books, 1969.

Wendel, Francois. Calvin: The Origins and Development of His Religious Thought. New York: Harper and Row, 1963. Grand Rapids: Baker Books, reprint 1997.

Dr. Marcus J. Serven, ThM and DMin

The Genevan Foundation – Copyright 2009 – All Rights Reserved

Calvin’s Letter to a Grieving Father

Strasbourg, France

Written by Dr. Marcus J. Serven

John Calvin (1509-1564) is best known as a distinguished theologian and leading Protestant Reformer. However, it must be remembered that he functioned first and foremost as a pastor to the congregation of believers at Geneva for 25 years, and at Strasbourg for a brief interlude of 3 years. The esteemed Calvin scholar Jean-Daniel Benoit had the following to say about Calvin’s pastoral ministry, 

The work of Calvin is immense and varied. Theologian, churchman, organizer of Protestantism in France, founder of the Academy of Geneva, public lecturer, Bible commentator, preacher at Saint Peter’s – Calvin was all of these. But to forget or to neglect the fact that Calvin was essentially and above all a pastor would be to misunderstand precisely that aspect of his personality which discloses the essential unity of his work, and to overlook the deep source of those waters which fecundate the entire field of his activity. In fact, theologian though he was, Calvin was even more a pastor of souls. More exactly, theology was for him the servant of piety and never a science sufficient unto itself. His thought is always directed towards life; always he descends from principles to the practical application; always his pastoral concern occurs.

Jean-Daniel Benoit, “Pastoral Care of the Prophet”, quoted in John Calvin Contemporary Prophet, 51
John Calvin as a young Pastor in Strasbourg

In this consolatory letter, written by Calvin to Monsieur de Richebourg, he shows the caring heart of the young minister of the gospel. Calvin was only thirty-one years old at the time he penned this letter, and he was away on an important mission to Ratisbon, Germany where he represented the city of Strasbourg at an ecclesiastical gathering. Two deceased men are mentioned in Calvin’s benevolent letter; (1) Louis – the young son of Monsieur de Richebourg, and (2) Claude Ferey – the distinguished Professor at the Academy of Strasbourg and Louis’ personal tutor. Sadly, both men were carried away by the Plague that swept through Strasbourg with deadly consequences in April, 1541. Calvin writes, 

The son whom the Lord had lent you for a season, he has taken away.  There is no ground, therefore, for those silly and wicked complaints of foolish men: O blind death! O horrid fate! O implacable daughters of destiny! O cruel fortune! The Lord who had lodged him here for a season, at this stage of his career has called him away. What the Lord has done, we must, at the same time, consider has not been done rashly, nor by chance, neither from having been impelled from without; but by that determinate counsel, whereby he not only foresees, decrees, and executes nothing but what is just and upright in itself, but also nothing but what is good and wholesome for us…

In what regards your son, if you bethink how difficult it is, in this most deplorable of ages, to maintain an upright course through life, you will judge him to be blessed, who, before encountering so many coming dangers which were already hovering over him, and to be encountered in his day and generation, was so early delivered from them all. He is like one who has set sail upon a stormy and tempestuous sea, and before he has been carried out into the deeps, gets in safety to the secure haven… 

But what advantage, you will say, is it to me to have had a son of so much promise, since he has been torn away from me in the first flower of his youth? As if, forsooth, Christ had not merited, by his death, the supreme dominion over the living and the dead!…However brief, therefore, either in your opinion or in mine, the life of your son may have been, it ought to satisfy us that he has finished the course which the Lord had marked out for him. Moreover, we may not reckon him to have perished in the flower of his age, who had grown ripe in the sight of the Lord…Nor can you consider to have lost him, whom you will recover in the blessed resurrection in the kingdom of God…

Neither do I insist upon your laying aside all grief. Nor, in the school of Christ, do we learn any such philosophy as requires us to put off that common humanity with which God has endowed us…set bonds, temper even your most reasonable sadness; that having shed those tears which were due to nature and to fatherly affection, you by no means give way to senseless wailing…May Christ the Lord keep you and your family, and direct you all with his own Spirit, until you may arrive where Louis and Claude have gone before.  

John Calvin, Selected Works: Letters, vol. 4, 246-253

Here we have an open window into the heart of John Calvin. And surprisingly, for some skeptical readers, it reveals a heart that is warm and tender towards those who suffer through the trials of life rather than one which is cold and hard. It is the heart of a true shepherd and pastor to his people. May we learn from Calvin’s compassionate example. 

Select Bibliography: 

Benoit, Jean-Daniel. “Pastoral Care of the Prophet,” from John Calvin Contemporary Prophet. 450th Anniversary volume celebrating the birth of John Calvin. Jacob T. Hoogstra, ed. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker book House, 1959.  

Calvin, John. Selected Works of John Calvin: Letters. Vol. 4. Jules Bonnet, ed. David Constable, trans. Reprint, Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1983. 

Calvin, John. Letters of John Calvin. Selections from the Bonnet Edition, 1851. Reprint, Edinburgh, Scotland: The Banner of Truth Trust, 1980.

Henderson, Henry F. Calvin in His Letters. Reprint, Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock Publishers, 1996. 

Walker, Williston. John Calvin: Organizer of Reformed Protestantism. New York, NY: G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 1904. Reprint, New York: Schocken Books, 1969.

Wallace, Ronald S. Calvin. Geneva, and the Reformation: A Study of Calvin as Social Worker, Churchman, Pastor and Theologian. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1988. Edinburgh, Scotland: Scottish Academic Press, 1990.

Wendel, Francois. Calvin: The Origins and Development of His Religious Thought. New York: Harper and Row, 1963. Reprint, Grand Rapids: Baker Books, 1997.

Dr. Marcus J. Serven, ThM and DMin

The Genevan Foundation – Copyright (2012) – All Rights Reserved

The Heidelberg Catechism: Comfort for a Troubled Soul

“Old Town” Heidelberg on the Rhine River in Southern Germany

Written by Dr. Marcus J. Serven

Out of all the Creeds, Confessions, and Catechisms written during the time of the Protestant Reformation, the Heidelberg Catechism (1563) is the most beloved. It is loved for its brevity, its faithfulness to the Bible, and its testimony to shared human experience. Written in Heidelberg, Germany by Zacharius Ursinus (1534-1583) and Caspar Olevianus (1536-1587), it touches the core of human emotion by making numerous statements throughout that affirm the promises of God. It has especially been appreciated during times of persecution, trial, and war. It was commissioned by Prince Frederick III (1515-1576) elector of the Palatinate in Southern Germany. The people of the Netherlands came to greatly appreciate this Catechism and made it part of the “Three Forms of Unity” that are affirmed in most Dutch Reformed Churches. The “Three forms of Unity” consist of: (1) The Belgic Confession, (2) The Canons of Dort, and (3) The Heidelberg Catechism.

What is unique and special about the Heidelberg Catechism? G. I. Williamson answers with the following thoughtful explanation,

“One of the unique things about the Heidelberg Catechism is that it really is two creeds in one. Or, to say it differently, there is a creed with this creed. You see, a large part of the catechism (or creed) is simply a careful explanation of the Apostles’ Creed. The Apostles’ Creed is the earliest, or most ancient, creed of the church. And right here we see one of the most important things about a creed that is true to the Bible–it remains true down through the ages. It does not need to be changed again and again, with each generation, because it deals with things that are unchanging. Thus, an accurate creed binds the generations together. It reminds us that the church of Jesus Christ is not confined to one age, just as it is not confined to any one place. In other words, there is a unity in what Christians have believed, right down through the ages. Just think of it: when we confess our faith today in the words of the Apostles’ Creed, we join with all those believers who have gone before us. Does this not demonstrate that there is indeed just one Lord and one true faith?”

G. I. Williamson, The Heidelberg Catechism, 3

Here are the first two questions–of one hundred and twenty-nine altogether–that show forth the experiential and personally relevant character of the Heidelberg Catechism. Note the emphasis on one’s “comfort” and personal assurance in the face of the many trials and tribulations of this world.

Lord’s Day 1 – With Scripture Proofs

Zacharius Ursinus (1534-1583)

Q. 1: What is thy only comfort in life and death? 

A.: That I with body and soul, both in life and death (1), am not my own (2), but belong unto my faithful Savior Jesus Christ (3); who, with His precious blood (4), hath fully satisfied for all my sins (5), and delivered me from all the power of the devil (6); and so preserves me (7) that without the will of my heavenly Father, not a hair can fall from my head (8); yea, that all things must be subservient to my salvation (9), and therefore, by His Holy Spirit, He also assures me of eternal life (10), and makes me sincerely willing and ready, henceforth, to live unto Him (11). 

  1. 1 Cor. 6:19-20
  2. Rom. 14:7-9 
  3. 1 Cor. 3:23 
  4. 1 Pet. 1:18-19
  5. John 1:17
  6. 1 John 3:8; Heb. 2:14-15
  7. John 6:39; John 10:28-29
  8. Luke 21:18; Matt. 10:30 
  9. Rom. 8:28 
  10. 2 Cor. 1:22; 2 Cor. 5:5 
  11. Rom. 8:14; Rom. 7:22 

Caspar Olevianus (1536-1587)

Q. 2: How many things are necessary for thee to know, that thou, enjoying this comfort, mayest live and die happily? 

A.: Three (1), the first, how great my sins and miseries are (2); the second, how I may be delivered from all my sins and miseries (3); the third, how I shall express my gratitude to God for such deliverance (4). 

  1. Luke 24:47
  2. 1 Cor. 6:10-11; John 9:41; Rom. 3:10, 19
  3. John 17:3 
  4. Eph. 5:8-10 

Let us, then, as students of the Bible resolve to learn the questions and answers from this historic catechism. It is an accurate summary of the teachings from the Bible. Plus, it addresses some of the most searching questions formulated by Christians who have experienced much misery and suffering. Soli Deo Gloria!

Select Bibliography: 

Beeke, Joel & Sinclair Ferguson, eds. Reformed Confessions Harmonized. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1999. 

Boekestein, William. The Quest for Comfort: The Story of the Heidelberg Catechism. Grand Rapids, MI: Reformation Heritage Books, 2011.

Douglas, J. D. ed. The New International Dictionary of the Christian Church. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House, 1974; Revised edition, 1978. 

  • “Calvin, John,” by W. S. Reid
  • “Calvinism,” by W. S. Reid
  • “Genevan Catechism,” by W. S. Reid
  • “Catechisms,” by Colin Buchanan
  • “Low Countries,” by Dirk Jellema
  • “Olevianus, Kaspar,” by J. G. C. Norman
  • “Protestantism,” by David C. Steinmetz
  • “Reformation, The,” by Robert D. Linder
  • “Reformed Churches,” by W. S. Reid
  • “Ursinus, Zacharias,” by Marvin W. Anderson

McKim, Donald K. ed. Encyclopedia of the Reformed Faith. Louisville, KY: Westminster/John Knox Press, 1992.

  • “Calvin, John,” by Hughes Oliphant Olds
  • “Calvinism,” by W. Stanford Reid
  • “Dutch Reformation,” by Donald Bruggink
  • “Genevan Reformation,” by Robert M. Kingdon
  • “Heidelberg Catechism,” by Shirley C. Guthrie
  • “Olevianus, Kaspar,” by Lyle D. Bierma
  • “Ursinus, Zacharius,” by Dirk Visser

Noll, Mark A., ed. Confessions and Catechisms of the Reformation. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1991.

Williamson, G. I. The Heidelberg Catechism: A Study Guide. Phillipsburg, NJ: P&R Publishers, 1993.

Dr. Marcus J. Serven, ThM and DMin

Genevan Foundation – Copyright 2020 – All Rights Reserved

Menno Simons: Leader of the Radical Reformation

“Old Town” Zurich and the River Limat in Switzerland

Written by Dr. Marcus J. Serven

Ulrich Zwingli
Conrad Grebel

It was on the 21st of January, 1525, that a dozen disillusioned men trudged through the snow near the city of Zurich, Switzerland to a dwelling where they could consult together in private. These men were known amongst themselves as the Swiss Brethren, or by their enemies, as the Anabaptists (“ana” = again + “baptist” = baptized). Central in this group of zealous young reformers were Conrad Grebel (1498-1526), Felix Manz (1498-1527), and Georg Blaurock (1492-1529). Each had recently participated in a heated public disputation with the renowned Swiss Reformer Ulrich Zwingli (1484-1531) concerning the biblical basis of infant baptism. The city council of Zurich had declared Zwingli the victor, hence the men would have to either change their views on the matter, flee the city, or suffer the consequences. After discussing their options, they chose the latter—to suffer for the sake of their convictions. That night they boldly separated from the main stream of the Protestant Reformation by re-baptizing themselves as adult believers. William Estep describes the scene in this way,

After prayer, Georg of the House of Jacob stood up and strongly urged Conrad Grebel for God’s sake to baptize him with the true Christian baptism upon his faith and knowledge. And when he knelt down and with such a request and desire, Conrad baptized him, since at that time there was no ordained minister to perform such work. Following their re-baptism they vigorously began to preach and teach about their new found beliefs.

William Estep, The Anabaptist Story
Anabaptists are drowned in the River Limat

The Anabaptist message spread rapidly to Germany, Austria, and the Netherlands resulting in a growing number of new congregations. Since the connection between the organized church and the civil government (i.e. the Magistrates) was very strong, any dissenters on theological grounds were quickly apprehended and sometimes even persecuted by the local authorities. Within a few short years, Conrad Grebel had died in prison (1526), Felix Manz had been arrested and sentenced to death by drowning (1527; his enemies caustically referred to this as his “third baptism”), and Georg Blaurock had been burned at the stake as a heretic (1529). Amazingly, Protestants had begun to persecute fellow Protestants! Swift martyrdom would become the norm for the Anabaptists for the next several centuries. In addition, many of the Magisterial Reformers began to forcefully speak out against the Anabaptists. Timothy George notes,

Heinrich Bullinger, for instance, called them “devilish enemies and destroyers of the church of God.” Luther’s preferred term was Schwarmer, which recalls the uncontrollable buzzing of bees around a hive, and which the German reformer applied indiscriminately to a wide host of adversaries. Calvin’s epithets were no less pejorative: “fanatics,” “deluded,” “scatter-brains,” “asses,” “scoundrels,” “mad dogs.” Interpreting the radicals in terms of dissent and nonconformity has skewed efforts to understand their own spiritual motivation.

Timothy George, Theology of the Reformers, 2nd edition, 267-268

God, however, in the midst of the persecution would raise up many courageous spokesmen to replace those who had suffered martyrdom for their faith. One such leader would be—the peaceable and articulate Dutchman, Menno Simons.

Menno Simons

Menno Simons (1496-1561) was born to a peasant family in the Friesland region of northern Holland. At twenty-eight years of age he became a Roman Catholic Priest in the village church at Pingjum, Friesland. While serving as priest a nagging question developed in his mind regarding the doctrine of transubstantiation (that belief that the bread and the wine actually become the body and blood of our Lord Jesus Christ). As a result, he began to have doubts as to the validity of the miracle of the Mass.

My reader, I write to you the truth in Christ and lie not. In the year 1524, being then in my twenty-eighth year, I undertook the duties of a priest in my father’s village, called Pingjum, in Friesland. Two other persons of about my age, also officiated in the same station. The one was my pastor, and was well learned in part; the other succeeded me; both had read the scriptures partially; but I had not touched them during my life, for I feared, if I should read them they would mislead me. Behold! such a stupid preacher was I, for nearly two years. In the first year thereafter a thought occurred to me, as often as I handled the bread and wine in the mass, that they were not the flesh and blood of the Lord. I thought that it was the suggestion of the devil, that he might lead me off from my faith. I confessed it often—sighed and prayed, yet I could not be freed from this thought.

Complete Works of Menno Simons, 668

Menno’s apprehension over the issue forced him to turn to the Bible. He searched for texts that would convincingly prove the doctrine of transubstantiation, but he was not satisfied with the explanations that he read and heard. Finally, he concluded that such doctrines were the fabrication of the Church and promoted idolatry. He wrote following his conversion these words of personal chastening,

Yes, I have said to a weak, perishing creature that came forth from the earth, that was broken in a mill, that was baked by the fire, that was chewed by my teeth and digested by my stomach, namely, to a mouthful of bread, Thou hast saved me…O God, thus have I, a miserable sinner, toyed with the harlot of Babylon for many years.

Complete Works of Menno Simons, 76

Another doctrine which came under Menno’s scrutiny was the practice of infant baptism.  In 1531 a Dutch Anabaptist, Sicke Snijder, was beheaded for being “re-baptized.” This shocking event caused Menno to rethink the whole issue of baptism and to question what practices were truly biblical. Menno had been taught in Roman Catholic theology that infants are born with original sin which must be covered by grace through the sacrament of infant baptism (ie: ex opere operato = the giving of grace is “done in the doing”). The sacrament, when administered by a Roman Catholic Priest, would confer upon the infant sufficient grace that if the baby should die it would avoid Limbus Infantum and reside in Purgatory or Heaven. As the baby grew into an adult that person’s faithful participation in the Church would result in the forgiveness of sins and the accrual of enough grace to enter Purgatory or Heaven. The Anabaptists completely rejected Roman Catholic sacramentalism as unscriptural, and thereby infant baptism as practiced in the Roman Catholic Church.

As a side note, it should be acknowledged that many other Protestants also reject the Roman Catholic sacramental system of baptism. Presbyterian and Reformed churches, for example, base infant baptism upon the Old Testament covenantal promises to parents (Deuteronomy 7:6-9). This promise is realized in the practice of circumcision (Genesis 17:7-14) and its clear connection with New Testament baptism (Acts 2:39; Colossians 2:11-12). Reformed believers reason that baptism in and of itself does not confer any grace–it is a sign and a seal of that grace. Baptism emphasizes God’s covenantal promises to the believing parents and identifies their baptized child as a member of God’s covenant community (i.e. the Church). Baptism, thereby, becomes an impetus for faithful Christian parents to evangelize and disciple their “covenant children” whom God has graciously given to them. It is also a significant reminder for baptized individuals (no matter what age they may be) to live up to the promises that God has placed upon their life.

Even with these doctrinal changes Menno remained a Roman Catholic Priest. He characterized his life at that time as “full of gambling and drinking.” However, in April 1535 three hundred armed Anabaptist believers overthrew the Old Cloister near Bolsward in Northern Holland. For eight days they withstood the assault of troops loyal to the Roman Catholic Church.  However, they were utterly defeated and mercilessly slaughtered. Among these radical Anabaptists were several whom Menno had taught in his own congregation, and even more disturbingly—the brother of Menno, Peter Simons.  Peter’s death had a profound effect upon Menno. This event, and the earlier debacle at Munster, Germany, where several thousand revolutionary Anabaptists where killed by both Lutherans and Roman Catholics alike, caused Menno to develop his firm opposition to warfare in every situation. He became an ardent and persuasive pacifist who repudiated taking up arms.

After this had transpired, the blood of these people, although mislead fell…hot on my heart…I reflected upon my unclean, carnal life, also the hypocritical doctrine and idolatry which I still practiced daily in appearance of godliness, but without relish. I saw that these zealous children, although in error, willingly gave their lives and their estates for their doctrine and faith. And I was one of those who had disclosed to some of them the abominations of the papal system. But I myself…acknowledged abominations simply in order that I might enjoy physical comfort and escape the cross of Christ.

Compete Works of Menno Simons, 670-671

He confessed his own hypocrisy, and finally his conversion came about in 1535 at age thirty-nine. He writes of this decisive experience,

My heart trembled within me. I prayed to God with the sighs and tears that He would give to me, a sorrowing sinner, the gift of His grace, create in me a clean heart, and graciously through the merits of the crimson blood of Christ forgive my unclean walk and frivolous easy life and bestow on me wisdom, Spirit, courage, and a manly spirit so that I might preach His exalted and adorable name and holy Word in purity.

Complete Works of Menno Simons, 671

On January 30, 1536, Menno preached his final sermon as a Roman Catholic Priest and formally sought out the fellowship of “peaceful” Anabaptists. Later that year, he identified with the small group led by Obbe Philips (1500-1568) where he was first baptized (1536), and then ordained (1537). When Obbe Philips stepped-back from his role as leader, due to his internal conflict over the death of so many of his followers, Menno stepped-up and filled the void along with Obbe’s younger brother Dirk Philips (1502-1568). This fledgling group grew in prominence so that most Anabaptists, in time, became known as Mennonites.

The Complete Works of Menno Simons

As successive Anabaptist leaders met their deaths by martyrdom, Menno survived them all and enjoyed a fruitful twenty-five year ministry throughout the Netherlands and Northern Germany. He often preached his gospel in small “home churches” and fled the authorities who sought to imprison him. His wife and children suffered great poverty from the rigors of living on the road. At one point the Emperor, Charles 5th, offered a reward of one hundred gold guilders for his capture. Nevertheless, Menno eluded every potential “Judas” and continued to preach, teach, and write. His most significant and systematic work was The Foundation of Christian Knowledge, which was published in 1539. His last years were spent in relative peace at Holstein; he died in his own bed at Wustenfelde, near Lubeck, in northern Germany and was buried in his garden.

Young Mennonite Women

Historically, Mennonite beliefs could be summarized in the following way: (a) the community of believers is stressed (so that marriage only among Anabaptist believers is encouraged); (b) each disciple commits themselves to a new way of life in Christ (which is sealed through adult baptism); (c) baptism is only offered to adult believers (usually by pouring); (d) foot-washing is often times practiced along with the Lord’s Supper (which is observed twice a year); (e) each individual and family is to withdraw from the secular world (so that participation in politics, higher learning, and the military is discouraged); (f) Scripture is taken literally and non-scriptural terms are generally not used (ie: the Trinity; (g) although it is affirmed as the teaching of the Bible the term is not used); (h) dogmatic theology is rejected (instead, personal experience is emphasized); (i) pacifism is encouraged (rather than nationalism, which leads to militarism); (j) each congregation is considered to be a “free” church (instead of having a hierarchical form of church government); (k) the “ban” (i.e shunning) is placed on those who have rejected the moral code of the church; (l) an imminent return of Jesus Christ is expected. Dress for men and women is to be modest, plain, and practical, so that clothing covers the majority of a person’s body. The modern-day proponents of Anabaptist theology are the following groups: the Mennonites, the Hutterites, the Amish, the Moravians, some Baptists, and the German Pietists.

Young Mennonite Men

Resources for Further Study:

Bainton, Roland H. The Reformation of the Sixteenth Century. Boston, MA: The Beacon Press, 1952.

Broderick, Robert C. The Catholic Encyclopedia. Revised Edition. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson Publishers, 1987.

Calvin, John. Treatises Against the Anabaptists and Against the Libertines. Benjamin W. Farley, ed. and trans. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 1982.

Douglas, J. D., ed. The New International Dictionary of the Christian Church. Revised Edition. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House, 1978.

  • “Anabaptists,” by Robert C. Clouse
  • “Baptists,” by Ernest F. Clipsham
  • “Blaurock, Georg,” by Robert D. Linder
  • “Grebel, Conrad,” by Peter Toon
  • “Hutterites,” by Ian Sellers
  • “John of Leyden,” by Dirk Jellema
  • “Manz, Felix,” by J. G. G. Norman
  • “Mennonites,” by J. C. Wenger
  • “Menno Simons,” by Dirk Jellema
  • “Philips, Dirk,” by Kenneth R. Davis
  • “Philips, Obbe,” by J. G. G. Norman
  • “Radical Reformation,” by Haddon Willmer
  • “Zwingli, Ulrich,” by Robert C. Walton

Douglas, J. D., ed. Who’s Who In Christian History. Wheaton, IL: Tyndale House Publishers, 1992.

Dowley, Tim, ed. The History of Christianity. Revised Edition. Oxford, UK: Lion Publishers, 1990.

Elwell, Walter A., ed. Evangelical Dictionary of Theology. Second Edition. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 2001.

  • “Baptist Tradition, The,” by E. F. Kevan
  • “Grebel, Conrad,” by J. C. Wenger
  • “Hubmaier, Balthasar,” by J. C. Wenger
  • “Mennonites,” by J. C. Wenger
  • “Menno Simons,” by J. C. Wenger
  • “Melchorites,” by J. C. Wenger
  • “Radical Reformation,” by J. D. Weaver
  • “Zwickau Prophets,” by J. D. Weaver

Estep, William R. The Anabaptist Story. Revised Edition. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdman’s Publishing Company, 1975.

George, Timothy. Theology of the Reformers. Revised Edition. Nashville, TN: B&H Publishing Group, 2013.

Hillerbrand, Hans J., ed. The Protestant Reformation. New York, NY: Harper and Row Publishers, 1968.

Houghton, S. M. Sketches from Church History. Carlisle, PA: The Banner of Truth Trust, 1980.

Mead, Frank S. Handbook of Denominations. 8th Edition. Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press, 1985.

Verduin, Leonard. The Reformers and Their Stepchildren. Grand Rapids, MI: WilliamB. Eerdman’s Publishing Company, 1964.

Wenger, John Christian, ed. The Complete Works of Menno Simons. Leonard Verduin, trans. Scottsdale, PA: Mennonite Publishing House, 1956.

Woodbridge, John D., ed. Great Leaders of the Christian Church, Chicago, IL: Moody Press, 1988.

Dr. Marcus J. Serven, ThM and DMin

Genevan Foundation – Copyright 2009 – All Rights Reserved

The Pilgrim Fathers: Diligent Seekers of Religious Liberty

Pastor John Robinson Prays for the Pilgrims as they Embark for the New World

Written by Dr. Marcus J. Serven

“Blessed are the people whose God is the LORD!” Psalm 144:15

“He provides food for those who fear him; he remembers his covenant forever.” Psalm 111:5

During the cool weeks of November that lead up to Thanksgiving Day there is great delight in many American homes when the exciting stories of the Pilgrims are read. Who were these people and what motivated them to endure such grievous hardships? The Pilgrims were Separatist Christians originating from the farmland around Scrooby in northern England. Because of their sincere desire to regulate their worship and lives by the Bible alone they experienced persecution and imprisonment during the reign of King James. At the direction of their pastor, Rev. Richard Clifton, they determined to flee England in search of religious freedom. They finally succeeded in 1609 after several failed attempts. The Pilgrims were also accompanied by Rev. John Robinson, their teacher, and Elder William Brewster. The Pilgrims initially settled in Amsterdam, Holland. But found it difficult to remain there and moved to Leyden where they lived for ten years.

When the explorations of Henry Hudson and John Smith became widely known, the Pilgrims determined to attempt the dangerous journey to the New World. They sincerely believed that they could better protect their children from worldly influences, preserve their English ways, and worship God in the manner they saw fit in the wilderness than in Holland. A mixed colony of Saints (Pilgrims) and Strangers (fellow-Englishmen) was formed under the auspices of the “Merchant Adventurers” of London. Terms were negotiated and signed, and the expedition set off in two ships. The Speedwell quickly proved to be less than seaworthy and the Pilgrims were forced sell it, reducing their numbers. They pressed as many passengers as possible into the “between deck” of the Mayflower

The Mayflower II a faithful replica of the original Mayflower

After a lengthy and arduous voyage across the stormy Atlantic they reached the New World much farther north than they had intended. Instead of the fertile shores of “Northern Virginia” they landed on the rocky barren coast of Cape Cod in New England. Since they were beyond the immediate jurisdiction of the Virginia Colony they determined to draft governing principles to better order their own settlement and solemnly composed the Mayflower Compact. All of the Saints signed, but not all of the Strangers. 

In the name of God, Amen. We whose names are underwritten, the loyal subjects of our dread sovereign lord, King James, by the grace of God, of Great Britain, France and Ireland, King, Defender of the Faith, etc. having undertaken for the glory of God, and advancement of the Christian faith, and honor of our king and country, a voyage to plant the first colony in the northern parts of Virginia, do by these presents solemnly and mutually in the presence of God, and of one another, covenant and combine ourselves into a civil body politic, for our better ordering and preservation, and the furtherance of the ends aforesaid and by virtue hereof to enact, constitute, and frame, such just and equal laws, ordinances, acts, constitutions, and offices, from time to time, as shall be thought most meet and convenient for the general use of the Colony, unto which we promise all due submission and obedience. In witness whereof we have here underscribed our names at Cape Cod, 11th of November, in the year of the reign of our sovereign lord, King James of England, France and Ireland the eighteenth, and of Scotland the fifty-fourth. A.D. 1620

William Bradford, Of Plymouth Plantation, 1651
Arriving at Plymouth Rock

Once they had landed, they immediately set off to replenish their food and water supplies. The Lord providentially led them to mounds of corn buried by local Indians; which they left payment for. They also sailed further west and found Plymouth Bay where they landed on December 21, 1620 at Plymouth Rock. Here they steadfastly carved their colony out of a hostile wilderness by erecting a squat common house for defense atop the nearest hill and a short row of small rustic cabins in which several families lived. This was not a comfortable English hamlet, but the Pilgrims insisted that, “It is not with us as with other men whom small things can discourage, or small discontentments cause (us) to wish (ourselves) at home again.” These people were made of sterner stuff! The first winter was exceedingly difficult for the Pilgrims. Out of 102 settlers roughly one half died from sickness before those disease-ridden months were completely over. The dead were quietly buried at night in unmarked graves so that the local Indians could not see how small their company had actually become. 

Having survived the winter, the following March they were visited by the Indian, Samoset. When he entered their tiny village he cried out in English “Welcome Englishmen! Do you have any beer?” The settlers were astonished to be greeted by an English-speaking Indian! Later, Samoset told them about his friend Squanto who spoke even better English. Squanto was clearly God’s gift to the Pilgrims. Governor William Bradford later referred to him as, “a special instrument sent of God for their good, beyond their expectation.” Squanto showed them how to raise corn, catch fish in the sea, and tread-out freshwater eels in the mudflats. Most importantly, he showed them how to survive the rigors of the American wilderness. With Squanto’s help the Pilgrims were able to negotiate a lasting peace with Massasoit, the local Indian chief, which lasted for over fifty years. The first Thanksgiving Day feast took place in November, 1621 after the Pilgrims brought in a substantial harvest. The Wampanoag tribe who had helped them so kindly was also welcomed to their burgeoning table. Edward Winslow, the assistant to Governor William Bradford, wrote about that special day in his brief history of Plymouth Colony, Mourt’s Relation. He described the scene this way,  

Our harvest being gotten in, our governor sent four men on fowling, so that we might after a special manner rejoice together after we had gathered the fruit of our labors. They four in one day killed as much fowl as, with a little outside help beside, served the company almost a week. At which time, amongst other recreations, we exercised our arms, many of the Indians coming amongst us, and among the rest their great king Massasoit, with some ninety men, whom for three days we entertained and feasted, and they went out and killed five deer, which they brought to the plantation and bestowed on our governor, and upon the captain and others. And although it be not always so plentiful as it was at this time with us, yet by the goodness of God, we are so far from want that we often wish you partakers of our plenty.

Edward Winslow, Mourt’s Relation, 72
Elder Brewster leading the Pilgrims in prayer at the 1st Thanksgiving Feast

Indeed, there was so much to thank God for! The Pilgrims sought a land where they could preserve their English culture and live as freemen; where they could raise their children free from worldly influences; and where they could worship God without hinderance in the manner they saw fit. Through great hardship they came to experience the reality of the Lord’s abundant promises: “He provides food for those who fear him; he remembers his covenant forever.” Psalm 111:5

Resources for Further Study: 

Beale, David. The Mayflower Pilgrims: Roots of Puritan, Presbyterian, Congregationalist, and Baptist Heritage. Greenville, SC: Ambassador-Emerald International, 2000.

Bradford, William. Of Plymouth Plantation (1620-1647). Samuel Eliot Morison, ed. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf, 2006. 

Brown, John. The Pilgrim Fathers of New England and their Puritan Successors. London, England: The Religious Tract Society, 1895. 

Foster, Marshall, and Swanson, Mary-Elaine. The American Covenant: The Untold Story. Revised Edition. Santa Barbara, CA: Co-published by The Foundation for Christian Self-Government (1981) and the Mayflower Institute (1983).

Fiore, Jordan D., ed. Mourt’s Relation: A Journal of the Pilgrims at Plymouth. Reprint, Plymouth, MA: Plymouth Rock Foundation, 1985. 

Gragg, Rod. The Pilgrim Chronicles: An Eyewitness History of the Pilgrims and the Founding of Plymouth Colony. Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, 2014. 

Jehle, Dr. Paul. Plymouth in the Words of Her Founders. San Antonio, TX: Vision Forum, 2002. 

Willison, George F. Saints and Strangers. New York, NY: Reynal & Hitchcock, 1945.

Books to Read Out Loud to Children:

Bulla, Clyde Robert. Squanto: Friend of the Pilgrims. New York, NY: Scholastic, Inc. 1954. 

Carpenter, Edmund J. The Mayflower Pilgrims. Arlington Heights, IL: Christian Liberty Press, n.d.

Daugherty, James. The Landing of the Pilgrims. New York, NY: Random House, Landmark Books, 1950. 

Foster, Marshall, and Swanson, Mary-Elaine. The American Covenant: The Untold Story. Revised Edition. Santa Barbara, CA: Co-published by The Foundation for Christian Self-Government (1981) and The Mayflower Institute (1983).

Pumphrey, Margaret B. Stories of the Pilgrims. New York, NY: Rand McNally & Company, 1912; Reprint, Corvallis, OR: Creation’s Child, 1986.

Otis, James. Mary of Plymouth. Reprint, Bulverde, TX: Mantle Ministries, 1999.

Dr. Marcus J. Serven, ThM and DMin

The Genevan Foundation – Copyright 2020 – All Rights Reserved

Squanto: “A Special Instrument of Good Sent by God”

The Arrival of the Pilgrims in America

Written by Dr. Marcus J. Serven

“As for you, you meant evil against me, but God meant it for good, to bring it about that many people should be kept alive, as they are today.” Genesis 50:20

Squanto was an American Indian of the Patuxant tribe who significantly helped the Pilgrims during the first two years of their settlement in New England. Without the timely help of Squanto (or Tisquantum), it is doubtful whether the frail Pilgrim settlement at Plymouth would have survived the second winter. The deep personal friendship between Squanto and the Pilgrims is noteworthy, in that from the first day that he met them he never left them. How was it possible that an English-speaking, God-fearing, lonely-hearted Indian would emerge out of the dense forests of New England to assist the starving Pilgrims? Here are the fascinating details of Squanto’s story. 

Tisquantum

Fifteen years prior to the arrival of the Pilgrims (AD 1605), Squanto, along with four other Indians, was kidnapped by an English mariner, Captain George Weymouth, and taken to England to impress his financial backers. He was given to Sir Fernando Gorges who later became a major investor in the Plymouth Company. While living with Sir Fernando Gorges, Squanto was favorably exposed to English ways, the English language, and the Christian gospel. Nine years later, in 1614, he returned to New England as part of an exploratory expedition led by Captain John Smith who used Squanto as an interpreter. When Smith departed Squanto was assigned to Captain Thomas Hunt. Dominated by avarice and greed, Hunt deceitfully lured many Indians aboard his ship and Squanto was kidnapped once again! All of these unfortunate captives were sold at the slave market in Malaga, Spain. But in God’s good providence, Squanto was purchased by some benevolent monks who eventually released him so that he could return home to the New World. He determined to make his way to England, which was familiar to him, and after successfully doing so he worked for several more years as a domestic servant for a wealthy merchant and ship-builder, Master John Slaney. Squanto made one journey to Newfoundland, but was not able to reach his village in Patuxant (the exact circumstances of this journey are a bit unclear). In time, though, he was able to secure another passage to America with a friendly sea captain, Thomas Dermer, who set him off in New England just six months (Spring, 1620) before the Mayflower dropped anchor in Plymouth Bay (December 19, 1620). 

Samuel de Champlain’s Map of Plymouth Harbor

Once Squanto returned to his own land, he found to his dismay that all of his tribe had been killed by a mysterious and unstoppable plague. No one from his entire village remained alive, so that Squanto became known amongst the other Indian tribes as “the last Patuxant.” Lonely and forlorn, he sought refuge amongst the Wampanoags, a nearby Indian tribe led by Chief Massasoit. He also became friendly with another Indian who served as a guide to the English by the name of Samoset. When the Pilgrims finally landed after a very rough sea voyage in December 1620, they unwittingly established their colony near, or perhaps on, the same site as Squanto’s Indian village. This unknown fact protected the Pilgrims from hostile and superstitious Indians who would not come near the former village of the unfortunate Patuxant tribe. The pioneering Pilgrims quickly erected a sturdy squat common house for defense on the top of the nearest hill, and a short row of small rustic cabins in which several crowded families lived. This was not a comfortable country hamlet, but the Pilgrims insisted that, “It is not with us as with other men whom small things can discourage, or small discontentments cause (us) to wish (ourselves) at home again.” These people were made of sterner stuff!

A replica of the Plymouth Plantation

The first winter was an exceedingly difficult time for the Pilgrims. Out of the 102 initial settlers, roughly one half died from sickness before those disease-ridden months were completely over. The dead were buried at night in unmarked graves so that any Indians lurking in the forests would not see how small their company had actually become. If it were not for the enduring presence of the Mayflower with its extra supplies and the sacrificial efforts of several of the more stout Pilgrims in caring for the sick, the number of dead would surely have been greater. But the winter finally gave way to the spring and having survived their snowy ordeal, the Pilgrims launched into the planting season with hopeful optimism. The barren rocky soil in Plymouth, however, proved to be very different from the productive fields of England and the fertile gardens of Holland. Beyond that, much of the seed for planting had been consumed during the desperate days of winter. Some additional “means” would have to be found to bring about a successful crop. The “means” that God provided was not a newly arrived ship crammed with fresh supplies, but a lonely Indian brave who longed to find a new home, a new family, and a new purpose for his life.

Squanto teaching the Pilgrims how to plant beans and maize

Squanto made his appearance in the rough-hewn village of Plymouth at the encouragement of his friend Samoset. It was said of Squanto that he knew the King’s English and the streets of London far better than his Pilgrim friends. He also knew all of the Indian ways that would be such a great help to the Pilgrims in their desperate hour. At just the right time God brought this unexpected deliverer upon the scene. Immediately, Squanto started educating the Pilgrims about how to fish, fertilize and plant corn, catch freshwater eels with their bare hands, and store food Indian-style. His most important role was in serving as an interpreter for the English in negotiating a pact of non-aggression and mutual defense with Chief Massasoit of the Wampanoags. Without the timely provision of Squanto’s assistance it is doubtful that such a permanent peace could have been negotiated. This peace treaty remained in effect for over fifty years. He was called by the Indians “the tongue of the Englishmen.” But, Governor William Bradford affectionately referred to him as, “a special instrument sent of God for their good, beyond their expectation.” Squanto had in God’s providence not only discovered a new home for himself built upon the ruins of his old village, but he had also adopted the Pilgrims as a replacement for his deceased Indian family.

It would be a complete mischaracterization to portray Squanto as one who never had any further troubles in his brief life. He struggled with a deep-seated jealousy when Hobomok, an official representative of Chief Massasoit, came to live in Plymouth. Evidently, Squanto enjoyed having a special relationship with the Pilgrims and was reluctant to share this unique privilege with others. Even the level-headed Massasoit grew irritated and angry with Squanto’s intrigues at one point and demanded his death. Yet, Governor Bradford’s urgent intercession for him prevented this rash deed from being carried out. Squanto also sought to gain an unhealthy advantage over his fellow Indians by asserting that the Pilgrims kept the “dreaded plague” under a loose plank in the floor of the common house. It was intimated that he could command them to cast it upon those whom he disliked. Thus he gained an elevated position amongst the local Indians for a short time, but in the end all of these ill-conceived schemes back-fired upon him and he was discovered as a fraud. 

Squanto helped the Pilgrims establish a pact of non-aggression with Chief Massasoit

It must be remembered that over-all Squanto was well-liked within the colony at Plymouth and proved to be a trusted and faithful friend to the Pilgrims throughout his entire life. Moreover, Squanto generously helped the Pilgrims in a sacrificial manner when they were most needy and destitute. Here was a man who truly laid down his life on behalf of his friends (John 15:13). What the wicked English sea captain meant for evil, God used for good, so that Squanto actually became a deliverer to the Pilgrims in their time of trouble (cf. Genesis 50:20). For without the assistance of Squanto, there very likely would have been no day of thanksgiving in November 1621 because there would have been too little food to warrant having a harvest celebration. Though, in God’s good providence there was an abundance of food and the celebration that became known as Thanksgiving took place. In the end, Squanto lived out the remainder of his life with the Pilgrims in Governor Bradford’s own home in the very center of Plymouth. He was a welcome member of the extended Bradford family all his days. His demise came rather unexpectedly while Squanto and others were on a necessary food-buying mission to the Indian tribes of Cape Cod during the winter of 1622. He endured a short bout with “Indian fever” and finally gave way to serious illness following a few days of suffering. After bequeathing his few possessions as “remembrances of love” to various Pilgrims, his final words were spoken to Governor Bradford. He simply requested “ye Governor to pray for him, that he might goe to ye Englishman’s God in heaven.” Let us remember the true and faithful promise, “Blessed are the dead who die in the Lord…that they may rest from their labors, for their deeds follow them.” (Revelation 14:13). 

Here are four of my favorite books on the Pilgrims

Resources for Further Study: 

Beale, David. The Mayflower Pilgrims: Roots of Puritan, Presbyterian, Congregationalist, and Baptist Heritage. Greenville, SC: Ambassador-Emerald International, 2000.

Bradford, William. Of Plymouth Plantation. Reprint, San Antonio, TX: co-published by Vision Forum & Mantle Ministries, 1988.

Bradford, William. Of Plymouth Plantation (1620-1647). Samuel Eliot Morison, ed. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf, 2006.

Brown, John. The Pilgrim Fathers of New England and their Puritan Successors. London, England: The Religious Tract Society, 1895. 

Gragg, Rod. The Pilgrim Chronicles: An Eyewitness History of the Pilgrims and the Founding of Plymouth Colony. Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, 2014.

Jehle, Paul. Plymouth in the Words of Her Founders. San Antonio, Texas, Vision Forum Ministries, 2002. 

Morison, Samuel Eliot. The Oxford History of the American People. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1965. 

Schmidt, Gary D. William Bradford: Plymouth’s Faithful Pilgrim. Grand Rapids, MI: William. B. Eerdmans, 1999. 

Willison, George F. Saints and Strangers. New York, NY: Reynal & Hitchcock, 1945.  

Winslow, Edward. Mourt’s Relation: A Journal of the Pilgrims at Plymouth. Jordan D. Fiore ed. Reprint, Plymouth, MA: Plymouth Rock Foundation, 1985.

Books to Read Out Loud to Children:

Bulla, Clyde Robert. Squanto: Friend of the Pilgrims. New York, NY: Scholastic, Inc. 1954. 

Carpenter, Edmund J. The Mayflower Pilgrims. Arlington Heights, IL: Christian Liberty Press, n.d.

Daugherty, James. The Landing of the Pilgrims. New York, NY: Random House, Landmark Books, 1950. 

Foster, Marshall, and Mary-Elaine Swanson. The American Covenant: The Untold Story. Revised edition. Santa Barbara, CA: co-published by The Foundation for Christian Self-Government in 1981, and by The Mayflower Institute in 1983.

Pumphrey, Margaret B. Stories of the Pilgrims. New York, NY: Rand McNally & Company, 1912. Reprint, Corvallis, OR: Creation’s Child, 1986.

Otis, James. Mary of Plymouth. Reprint, Bulverde, TX: Mantle Ministries, 1999.

Dr. Marcus J. Serven, ThM and DMin

The Genevan Foundation – Copyright 2020 – All Rights Reserved

The Pilgrim Fathers: Thanking God for His Providential Care

One Artist’s Portrayal of the First Thanksgiving

Written by Dr. Marcus J. Serven

“And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to his purpose.” Romans 8:28 

The rigors of the first winter for the Mayflower Pilgrims are well-known to most students of American history (1620-1621). Nearly half of the original 102 settlers died during that intense season of sickness, suffering, and sadness. Yet, God providentially intervened in several remarkable ways throughout the following spring and summer by providing help in the midst of their infirmities. In particular, the Lord provided an English-speaking, God-fearing, lonely-hearted Indian by the name of Tisquantum. It was said of Squanto that he knew the King’s English and the streets of London far better than his Pilgrim friends. He also knew all of the Indian ways that would be such a great help to the Pilgrims in their desperate hour. At just the right time God brought this unexpected deliverer upon the scene. Immediately, Squanto started educating the Pilgrims on how to catch fish out in Plymouth Bay, and how to capture freshwater eels in the stream with their bare hands. He also taught them how to fertilize and plant corn, and how to safely store the harvested corn Indian-style. Arguably, his most important role was in serving as an interpreter for the English in negotiating a pact of non-aggression and mutual defense with Chief Massasoit of the Wampanoags. Without the timely provision of Squanto’s assistance it is doubtful that such a permanent peace could have been negotiated. This peace treaty remained in effect for over fifty years. He was warily called by the Indians “the tongue of the Englishmen.” But, Governor William Bradford affectionately referred to him as, “a special instrument sent of God for their good, beyond their expectation.” In God’s unforeseen providence Squanto not only discovered a new home for himself built near his old village, but he was lovingly adopted by the Pilgrims and became a respected member of their community. 

It was out of this surprising set of circumstances that the Pilgrim’s gathered in the fall of 1621 to hold a feast of thanksgiving to God. Their feast was most likely based upon the Old Testament practice of the Israelites who were instructed by God to hold a feast of thanksgiving at the end of the harvest season. In ancient days this festival was known as the “Feast of Booths” because its celebrants were to live outdoors in primitive huts for seven days. The Bible records the following instructions, 

On the fifteenth day of the seventh month, when you have gathered in the produce of the land, you shall celebrate the feast of the LORD seven days. On the first day shall be a solemn rest, and on the eighth day shall be a solemn rest. And you shall take on the first day the fruit of splendid trees, branches of palm trees and boughs of leafy trees and willows of the brook, and you shall rejoice before the LORD your God seven days. You shall celebrate it as a feast to the LORD for seven days in the year. It is a statute forever throughout your generations; you shall celebrate it in the seventh month. You shall dwell in booths for seven days. All native Israelites shall dwell in booths, that your generations may know that I made the people of Israel dwell in booths when I brought them out of the land of Egypt: I am the LORD your God.

Leviticus 23:39-43; English Standard Version

It should be noted that the Pilgrims did not hold this feast of thanksgiving to satisfy the provisions of the Old Testament ceremonial law—which they believed had been completely fulfilled through the sacrificial death of Jesus Christ—but to obey the biblical principle of being thankful for all that God had provided. Thus, they prepared a feast of thanksgiving out of gratitude for God’s abundant blessings. The evangelization of the Indians was also on their minds, therefore they invited Massasoit and his braves to attend. It was quite a surprise when he showed up with ninety hungry warriors!

Here are two eyewitness accounts of the original thanksgiving feast. The first testimony is from the Pilgrim author Edward Winslow (1595-1655) who wrote this account during the second winter and published it in his book, Mourt’s Relation: A Journal of the Pilgrim’s at Plymouth (1622). Winslow remarked, 

Our harvest being gotten in, our governor sent four men on fowling, so that we might after a special manner rejoice together after we had gathered the fruit of our labors. They four in one day killed as much fowl as, with a little outside help beside, served the company almost a week. At which time, amongst other recreations, we exercised our arms, many of the Indians coming amongst us, and among the rest their great king Massasoit, with some ninety men, whom for three days we entertained and feasted, and they went out and killed five deer, which they brought to the plantation and bestowed on our governor, and upon the captain and others. And although it be not always so plentiful as it was at this time with us, yet by the goodness of God, we are so far from want, that we often wish you partakers of our plenty.

Edward Winslow, Mourt’s Relation, 72

Curious historians have often wondered, “What was on the menu for that first thanksgiving feast?” Evidently no one ever wrote down the exact menu. But the answer is not too difficult to reconstruct given an awareness of English culinary practices and the testimony of the second eyewitness, Gov. William Bradford (1590-1657). He wrote of this time period in his informative book, Of Plymouth Plantation (1647). 

They began now to gather in the small harvest they had, and to prepare their houses for the winter, being well recovered in health and strength, and plentifully provisioned: for while some had been thus employed in affairs away from home, others were occupied in fishing for cod, bass, and other fish, of which they caught a good quantity, every family having their portion. All the summer there was no want. And now, as winter approached, wild fowl began to arrive, of which there were plenty when they came here first, though afterwards they became more scarce. As well as wild fowl, they got abundance of wild turkeys, besides venison, etc. Each person had about a peck of meal a week, or now, since harvest, Indian corn in that proportion; and afterwards many wrote at length about their plenty to their friends in England,—not feigned but true reports. 

William Bradford, Of Plymouth Plantation, 89

Therefore, an educated guess of what was on the menu of that first thanksgiving feast would include the following items:

From the two quotes we learn that the feast included cod, sea bass, wildfowl (such as ducks, geese, turkeys and swans), corn meal (and probably wheat), and five deer brought by the Indians. Meat, fish, and bread were the most important elements of the English diet at this time, although fruits and “herbs” were also eaten. The term “vegetables” was not in use at this time; edible plants were known as sallet herbs, potherbs or roots. It is quite possible that shellfish were not a feature at the feast, for although they were plentiful and formed a large part of the Pilgrim’s diet in the early years, they were looked on as poverty fare and hence inappropriate for a feast. The meats were roasted or boiled in traditional English fashion, and the fish boiled or perhaps grilled in the Indian manner. Breads were skillet breads cooked by the fire or perhaps risen breads baked in a clay or cloam oven. Fruit tarts were produced in the same way. The herbs were either boiled along with the meats as “sauce,” or used in “sallets.” A sallet was a vegetable dish either cooked or raw, and either “simple” or “compound” (that is, made from one ingredient or several). The popularity of sallet or vegetable dishes was not great at this time. Therefore, they are not always mentioned although they were served fairly frequently…beverages included beer, Aqua Vitae (or “strong waters”) and water.

Carolyn Travers, The Thanksgiving Primer, 17

Overall, we can deduce from the evidence that the Pilgrims held a feast of great abundance. Chief Massasoit and his men were greeted by an overflowing table as they sat down to eat. One wonders if they had ever seen so much food at any one setting before! Certainly, this feast was a fitting celebration of God’s providential care. Moreover, it was an amazing testament to the Pilgrim’s indefatigable efforts and their sacrificial labors in carving out a new home in the rough and rocky wilderness of New England. 

With God’s help they survived the severities of the second winter (1621-1622), and prospered so much that another thanksgiving feast was held after the harvest in the fall of 1622. In time, the feast of thanksgiving became an annual event that was much anticipated by all of the inhabitants of Plymouth— both young and old alike. It was filled with bountiful platters of food, multiple contests of skill, and grateful times of worship. Although there would be many challenging circumstances yet to come in the life of Plymouth’s Pilgrims—the preservation of their fragile colony through cold, deceit, famine, financial worry, political intrigue, religious persecution, schism, sickness, storm, sudden fire, and war all demonstrated the magnanimous favor of God in the midst of their hardships. The Pilgrims themselves steadfastly believed that God had preserved and protected them, and that he was worthy of all praise and thanksgiving for the mercies of his providential care. On this providential theme Gov. William Bradford wrote the following comments about the year 1630. He noted, 

Thus out of small beginnings greater things have been produced by His hand that made all things out of nothing, and gives being to all things that are; and, as one small candle may light a thousand, so the light here kindled has shone unto many, yea in some sort to our whole nation; let the glorious name of Jehovah have all the praise.

William Bradford, Of Plymouth Plantation, 226

Indeed, the Lord watched over the Pilgrims and providentially supplied their needs. This promise from the Bible certainly rang true for the Pilgrims of Plymouth… 

“Praise the LORD! Blessed is the man who fears the LORD, who greatly delights in his commandments! His offspring will be mighty in the land; the generation of the upright will be blessed.” Psalm 112:1-2

The Pilgrims on their way to worship God

Resources for Further Study: 

Bartlett, Robert M. The Faith of the Pilgrims: An American Heritage. New York, NY: United Church Press, 1978.

Beale, David. The Mayflower Pilgrims: Roots of Puritan, Presbyterian, Congregationalist, and Baptist Heritage. Greenville, SC: Ambassador-Emerald International, 2000.

Bradford, William. Of Plymouth Plantation (1620-1647). Samuel Eliot Morison, ed. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf, 2006. 

Brown, John. The Pilgrim Fathers of New England and their Puritan Successors. London, England: The Religious Tract Society, 1895.

Gragg, Rod. The Pilgrim Chronicles: An Eyewitness History of the Pilgrims and the Founding of Plymouth Colony. Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, 2014. 

Jehle, Dr. Paul. Plymouth in the Words of Her Founders. San Antonio, TX: Vision Forum, 2002.

Marshall, Peter, and David Manuel. The Light and the Glory: Did God have a plan for America? Grand Rapids, MI: Fleming H. Revell, 1977. 

Ryken, Leland. Wordly Saints: The Puritans As They Really Were. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House, 1986.

Schmidt, Gary D. William Bradford: Plymouth’s Faithful Pilgrim. Grand Rapids, MI: William. B. Eerdmans, 1999.

Travers, Carolyn Freeman, ed. The Thanksgiving Primer. Plymouth, MA: Plimoth Plantation Publication, 1991.

Willison, George F. Saints and Strangers. New York, NY: Reynal & Hitchcock, 1945.

Winslow, Edward. Mourt’s Relation: A Journal of the Pilgrims at Plymouth. Jordan D. Fiore ed. Reprint, Plymouth, MA: Plymouth Rock Foundation, 1985.

Books to Read Out Loud to Children:

Bulla, Clyde Robert. Squanto: Friend of the Pilgrims. New York, NY: Scholastic, Inc. 1954. 

Carpenter, Edmund J. The Mayflower Pilgrims. Arlington Heights, IL: Christian Liberty Press, n.d.

Daugherty, James. The Landing of the Pilgrims. New York, NY: Random House, Landmark Books, 1950. 

Foster, Marshall, and Mary-Elaine Swanson. The American Covenant: The Untold Story. Revised edition. Santa Barbara, CA: co-published by The Foundation for Christian Self-Government in 1981 and by The Mayflower Institute in 1983.

Pumphrey, Margaret B. Stories of the Pilgrims. New York, NY: Rand McNally & Company, 1912. Reprint, Corvallis, OR: Creation’s Child, 1986.

Otis, James. Mary of Plymouth. Reprint, Bulverde, TX: Mantle Ministries, 1999.

Dr. Marcus J. Serven, ThM and DMin

The Genevan Foundation – Copyright 2020 – All Rights Reserved

« Older posts Newer posts »