The Genevan Foundation

How the Protestant Reformers are Still Changing the World

Tag: Reformed Theology (Page 2 of 3)

G. I. Williamson on Adoption

September 26, 2022 /

The books of certain authors have a prominent place in my own personal library. My shelves are full of volumes written by Herman Bavinck, Louis Berkhof, John Calvin, Sinclair Ferguson, Martin Luther, John Murray, J. I. Packer, R. C. Sproul, B. B. Warfield, and David Wells. I’m going to guess that you get the drift of my theological interests! Here is another name that deserves mention–Rev. G. I. Williamson. He has written several books on Christian doctrine, but perhaps the best known of his writings is the well-regarded: The Westminster Confession of Faith: For Study Classes, P&R, (1st edition) 1964, (second edition) 2004.

Rev. G. I. Williamson (1925–present)

Over the years I have used both editions in countless Bible studies, Youth Meetings, Sunday School classes, and in my own study and reflection on the Westminster Confession of Faith. As a Presbyterian minister I have made it my goal to write out and carefully study each head of doctrine in the Confession of Faith. G. I. Williamson’s book has helped me immensely in fulfilling that personal resolution. He gives a comprehensive explanation of each chapter in the Confession of Faith and refers to many of the Scripture proofs that give the rationale for every point of doctrine. For me, this approach is invaluable! Below are two quotes from his summary on the often-neglected doctrine of Adoption. Each explanation is clear, pastoral, and timely for Christians everywhere to reflect upon and treasure. Enjoy!

“Adoption, like the other aspects of the application of redemption, is inseparably connected with (1) the eternal decree of God, and (2) the mediatorial work of Christ. We are “predestined…to adoption as sons” (Eph. 1:5). Because “He chose us in Him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before Him” (vs. 4), he ordered not only the end from the beginning, but also every step necessary to the attainment of that end. One step that is necessary to the attainment of this end is adoption. God chose his elect not only to be regenerated, justified, sanctified, and glorified, but also to be adopted.” (Williamson, The Westminster Confession of Faith: for Study Classes, 145-146)

“But what is adoption? “Adoption, as the term clearly implies, is an act of transfer from an alien family into the family of God himself” (John Murray, Redemption Accomplished and Applied, [Grand Rapids: Eerdmans. 1955]). It means that those who were by nature children of wrath, children of darkness, even children of Satan (Eph. 2:3; Col. 3:6; John 8:44), are constituted children of light and of God…Finally, we note that God treats such persons as children. They receive his pity and protection (Ps. 103:13; Prov. 14:26). They are under this watchful providence (Matt. 6:30-32; 1 Peter 5:7). He also subjects them to appropriate discipline because they are his sons (Heb. 12:6-11). But above all, he keeps them in safety even to the end (Rom. 8:23, 28, 38-39).” (Williamson, The Westminster Confession of Faith: for Study Classes, 146, 148)

— Dr. Marcus J. Serven

St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre

August 27, 2022 /
Here is one artist’s portrayal of the ugly scene in Paris, France when thousands of French Huguenots were murdered at the St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre

The St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre on the night of August 23-24, 1572 is a sad legacy of the Roman Catholic Counter-Reformation. It is difficult for me to even imagine the horror of that night! Thousands of French Protestants (i.e. the Huguenots) were viciously murdered by Roman Catholic troops loyal to King Charles IX and his mother Catherine de’ Medici. From that time on, the Huguenots became an oppressed minority in France–often hunted down, brutally arrested, falsely imprisoned, and martyred for their faith. They persevered through much persecution and suffered for the sake of the Gospel.

French Huguenot Church in Charleston, South Carolina

In the late 1600’s many French Huguenot families fled to America. The first Huguenot church was established in Charleston, South Carolina in 1681. It still stands today and is an active congregation whose members maintain the witness of the Huguenot faith (i.e. Reformed Calvinistic Protestantism). The Huguenots who came to America and settled in the Carolinas were largely responsible for resisting the tyranny of Great Britain during the late-1700’s during the Revolutionary War. We owe them a debt that cannot be repaid.

It is proper, in my opinion, to remember them as sincere Christian men and women who treasured religious freedom and who rejected oppressive government. And that, is a wonderful testimony to their persevering spirit! Surely Jesus spoke of them when he preached, “Blessed are those who are persecuted for righteousness’ sake for theirs is the kingdom of heaven” (Matthew 5:10).

— Dr. Marcus J. Serven

Berkhof on Sanctification

July 16, 2022 /
Louis Berkhof’s highly-regarded Systematic Theology

Prof. Louis Berkhof (1873-1957): “Sanctification: It is a work of God in which believers co-operate. When it is said that a man takes part in the work of sanctification, this does not mean that man is an independent agent in the work, so as to make it partly the work of God and partly the work of man; but merely, that God affects the work in part through the instrumentality of man as a rational being, by requiring of him prayerful and intelligent co-operation with the Spirit. That man must co-operate with the Spirit of God follows: (a) from the repeated warnings against evils and temptations, which clearly imply that man must be active in avoiding the pitfalls of life, Rom. 12:9, 16-17; 1 Cor. 6:9-10; Gal. 5:16-23; and (b) from the constant exhortations to holy living. These imply that the believer must be diligent in the employment of the means at his command for the moral and spiritual improvement of his life, Micah 6:8; John 15:2, 8, 16; Rom. 8:12-13; Rom. 12:1-2, 17; Gal. 6:7-8, 15.” (Berkhof, Systematic Theology, 534)

Berkhof on “The Passive Obedience of Christ”

May 23, 2022 /
Prof. Louis Berkhof

“Christ as Mediator also entered the penal relation to the law, in order to pay the penalty in our stead. His passive obedience consisted in His paying the penalty of sin by His sufferings and death, and this discharging the debt of all His people. The sufferings on Christ, which have already been described, did not come upon Him accidentally, nor as the result of purely natural circumstances. They were judicially laid upon Him as our representative, and were therefore really penal sufferings. The redemptive value of these sufferings results from the following facts: They were borne by a divine person who, only in virtue of His deity, could bear the penalty through to the end and thus obtain freedom from it. In view of the infinite value of the person who undertook to pay the price and to bear the curse, they satisfied the justice of God essentially and intensively. They were strictly moral sufferings, because Christ took them upon Himself voluntarily, and was perfectly innocent and holy in bearing them. The passive obedience of Christ stands out prominently in such passages as the following: Isa. 53:6; Rom. 4:25; 1 Pet. 2:24, 3:18: 1 John 2:2, while His active obedience is taught in such passages as Matt. 3:15, 5:17-18; John 15:10; Gal. 4:4-5; Heb. 10:7-9, in connection with the passages which teach us that Christ is our righteousness, Rom. 10:4; 2 Cor. 5:21; Phil. 3:9; and that He secured for us eternal life, the adoption of sons, and an eternal inheritance, Gal. 3:13-14, 4:4-5; Eph. 1:3-12, 5:25-27.” (Berkhof, Systematic Theology, 381)

Source: Louis Berkhof. Systematic Theology. 4th Edition. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdman’s Publishing Company, 1939.

— Dr. Marcus J. Serven

Berkhof on “The Active Obedience of Christ”

May 23, 2022 /
Prof. Louis Berkhof

“Christ as Mediator entered into the federal relation in which Adam stood in the state of integrity, in order to merit eternal life for the sinner. This constitutes the active obedience of Christ, consisting in all that Christ did to observe the law in its federal aspect, as the condition for obtaining eternal life. The active obedience of Christ was necessary to make His passive obedience acceptable with God, that is, to make it an object of God’s good pleasure. It is only on account of it that God’s estimate of the sufferings of Christ differs from His estimate of the sufferings of the lost. Moreover, if Christ had not rendered active obedience, the human nature of Christ itself would have fallen short of the just demands of God, and He would not have been able to atone for others. And, finally, if Christ had suffered only the penalty imposed on man, those who shared in the fruits of His work would have been left exactly where Adam was before he fell. Christ merits more for sinners than the forgiveness of sins. According to Gal. 4:4-5 they are through Christ set free from the law as the condition of life, are adopted to be sons of God, and as sons are also heirs of eternal life, Gal. 4:7. All this is conditioned primarily on the active obedience of Christ. Through Christ the righteousness of faith is substituted for the righteousness of the law, Rom. 10:3-4. Paul tells us that by the work of Christ ‘the righteousness of the law is fulfilled in us,’ Rom. 8:3-4; and that we are made ‘the righteousness of God in Him,’ 2 Cor. 5:21.” (Berkhof, Systematic Theology, 380)

Source: Louis Berkhof. Systematic Theology. 4th Edition. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdman’s Publishing Company, 1939. 

— Dr. Marcus J. Serven

Update on the Theology Study Group

May 12, 2022 /
An after class celebration at Pok-e-Jo’s Smokehouse in Austin

Over the past twenty-two months I have really enjoyed the privilege of teaching theology to this serious group of adult-learners. We call ourselves the “Theology Study Group.” Our class formed in the Summer of 2020 with four students and over time we grew to sixteen students. The basic plan was to meet weekly on Thursday mornings (weather, vacations, and illnesses permitting) at Redeemer Presbyterian Church. The Lord has certainly blessed us as we dug deep into the Bible and wrestled with all of the major doctrines of the Christian faith.

Today we reached the final pages in Louis Berkhof’s “Manual of Christian Doctrine” and we discussed–as you might expect–the Return of Christ and the coming Judgment Day. The promise of “the blessed hope” which is “the appearing of…our great God and Savior Jesus Christ” (Titus 2:13) is a strong motivation to holy living and faithfulness. What a privilege it is to reflect on these precious doctrines of God. Class members: (L-R) Max, Donna, Steven, Albert, David, Joel, Bret, me, Steven, and Boyd. Missing from this picture are regular attenders: Robert, Brian, Joseph, and Jack.

— Dr. Marcus J. Serven

R. C. Sproul on “Free Will”

April 26, 2022 /
Dr. R. C. Sproul

“The Reformers believed that the will, although in a fallen state, could still achieve civic virtue or civic righteousness. Fallen man can still obey the traffic lights and so on, but he cannot incline himself to the things of God. Jesus said, ‘This is why I told you that no one can come to me unless it is granted him by the Father’ (John 6:65). ‘No one can’ means that no one is able. One of the key doctrines of the Reformation was sola gratia, meaning that we are saved by God’s grace alone and not from our own efforts. Does fallen man have the ability to turn to Christ and to choose Him before he is born of the Holy Spirit? Most professing evangelical Christians today believe that faith comes first and then rebirth. This presupposes that the unconverted person has the ability to incline himself, or choose to come, to Jesus Christ. Augustine, Luther, Calvin, and Edwards said that no one is able to do that. If we continue to think that in our fallen state we have the moral ability to come to Christ apart from the grace of God, we do so at our own peril. In John 6:65, our Lord clearly says that no one is able to come to Him unless the ability to do so is given to him by the Father. Fortunately for us, Jesus puts the word ‘unless’ in the statement. That word points to what we call a necessary condition, a sine qua non. A necessary condition has to be met before a desired result can occur. The desired result is coming to Christ; the necessary condition is that the ability to come must be given to each person by the Father. Only God gives that ability. No one can come to Christ on his own; we are not able to, unless God gives us the moral ability to do it.” (Sproul, Truths We Confess, 235-236)

Source: Sproul, R. C. Truths We Confess: A Systematic Exposition of the Westminster Confession of Faith. Orlando, FL: Reformation Trust Publishing, 2019.

Louis Berkhof on the “Mode of Baptism”

December 9, 2021 /
Prof. Louis Berkhof of Calvin Theological Seminary

“Is immersion that only proper mode of baptism? The generally prevailing opinion outside of Baptist circles is that, as long as the fundamental idea, namely, that of purification, finds expression in the rite, the mode of baptism is quite immaterial. It may be administered by immersion, by pouring or effusion, or by sprinkling. The Bible simply uses a generic word to denote an action designed to produce a certain effect, namely, cleansing or purification, but nowhere determines the specific mode in which the effect is to be produced. Jesus did not prescribe a certain mode of baptism. He evidently did not attach as much importance to it as the Baptists do. Neither do the Biblical examples of baptism stress any particular mode…That this purification was sometimes effected by sprinkling, is evident from Num. 8:7; 19:13, 18, 19, 20; Ps. 51:7; Ezek. 36:25; Heb. 9:10…Neither is this possible in connection with the following passages of the New Testament: Matt. 3:11; Luke 11:37-38; 12:50; Rom. 6:3; 1 Cor. 12:13; Heb. 9:10 (cf. verses 13, 14, 19, 21); 1 Cor. 10:1-2. Since the word baptizo does not necessarily mean ‘to immerse,’ and because the New Testament does not in any case explicitly assert that baptism took place by immersion, the burden of proof would seem to rest on the Baptists…The passages referred to in the preceding prove that many Old Testament washings (baptizings) took place by sprinkling. In a prophecy respecting the spiritual renewal of the New Testament day the Lord says: ‘And I will sprinkle clean water upon you, and ye shall be clean,’ Ezek. 36:25. The matter signified in baptism, namely, the purifying Spirit, was poured out upon the Church, Joel 2:28-29; Acts 2:4, 33. And the writer of Hebrews speaks of his readers as having their hearts sprinkled from an evil conscience, Heb. 10:22.” (Berkhof, Systematic Theology, 629-631)

John Calvin on “Infant Baptism”

December 3, 2021 /

Here is a short summary statement of John Calvin’s argument for applying the sign of baptism to the children of Believers:

John Calvin (1509-1564)

“Reason would tell us that baptism is rightly administered to babies. The Lord did not give circumcision long ago without making them (infants) partakers of everything represented by circumcision. He would have been deceiving his people with a sham, if he had reassured them with false signs. The idea is very shocking. He distinctly states that the circumcision of the infant is the seal of covenant promise. If the covenant remains firm and unmoved, this is just as relevant to the children of Christians today as it was to the children of the Jews under the Old Testament…The truth of baptism applies to infants, so why do we deny them the sign? The Lord himself formally admitted infants to his covenant, so what more do we need?”

John Calvin, Institutes of the christian religion, 4:16:5 (Beveridge Edition)

Most Reformed and Presbyterian families embrace Calvin’s way of thinking when it comes to our “Covenant Children.” We understand that God has given each child to the Christian family as a “heritage,” a “reward,” and a “blessing” (Ps. 127:3-5). And, that the sign and seal of the Old Testament–which was circumcision (Gen. 17:7-9; Rom. 4:11)–has now been replaced by baptism in the New Testament (Col. 2:11-12). Standing on the promises of the Covenant of Grace, Christian parents are solemnly tasked by Jesus Christ “to make disciples” of their children by “baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit” (Matt. 28:19). Lastly, they are instructed by the Apostle Paul to “bring them up in the discipline and instruction of the Lord” (Eph. 6:4; Matt. 28:20). This is serious business!

An Infant Baptism at Covenant Family Church in Troy, MO

Therefore, it is imperative that Christian fathers and mothers embrace the promises of God for each one of their children (Ps. 78:1-8). Consider the Apostle Peter’s striking admonition to his fellow Jews on the day of Pentecost, “For the promise is for you and for your children and for all who are far off, everyone whom the Lord our God calls to himself” (Acts 2:39). In other words, those who follow Jesus Christ as His disciples are responsible by faith to entrust the spiritual awakening of their own children to God’s gracious work (John 3:3-5; Titus 3:5-7). We do this by presenting our “Covenant Children” for baptism and by instructing them in the truths of the Gospel as they mature.

Soli Deo Gloria!

— Dr. Marcus J. Serven

R. C. Sproul on Adoption

October 18, 2021 /

“The Spirit himself bears witness with our spirit that we are children of God, and if children, then heirs—heirs of God and fellow heirs with Christ, provided we suffer with him in order that we may also be glorified with him.” Romans 8:16-17

The doctrine of adoption is one of the most neglected aspects of Reformed soteriology. It spells out the change in legal status before God that believers in Christ now enjoy–that by an act of grace we become God’s sons and daughters. Moreover, it addresses the benefits and blessings that we receive from our heavenly Father. In particular, how He provides for our needs and providentially watches over the details of our life protecting us from harm. Dr. R. C. Sproul makes the following insightful comment about our adoption:

Dr. R. C. Sproul

Christ is God’s single heir by nature. He is the Father’s Son. We who are adopted become heirs of God, joint heirs with Christ, and ours is the most valuable and rich inheritance that anybody can have. The inheritance is given by God the Father to His Son, and everything Christ possesses is given to us, as His adopted brothers and sisters, including the gift of eternal life. He is called the first fruits of those who are raised from the dead. As God the Father has raised our elder brother from the grace, so He promises to do the same for us. It is an incalculable inheritance that God has preserved for His people, and at the last day God will say to His children, “Come, you who are blessed by my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world”(Matt. 25:34).

R. C. Sproul, Truths We Confess, 283

When we reflect on the doctrine of adoption, we learn how God has given believers a new legal standing. As a result of the work of Jesus Christ on our behalf we can now know that we have been justified, redeemed, reconciled, and adopted. These positional truths are absolute “game-changers” in the midst of the trials and tribulations of life. They give each believer a clear understanding of who they are in Christ and what kind of relationship they now enjoy with their heavenly Father.

Here are three additional passages from the Bible that feature the doctrine of adoption–one from the Lord Jesus Christ, one from the Apostle Paul, and a final one from the Apostle John :

“Or to which one of you, if his son asks him for bread, will give him a stone? Or if he asks for a fish, will give him a serpent? If you then, who are evil, know how to give good fits to your children, how much more will your Father who is in heaven give good things to those who ask him!” Matthew 7:9-11

“But when the fulness of time had come, God sent forth his Son, born of a woman, born under the law, to redeem those who were under the law, so that we might receive adoption as sons.” Galatians 4:4-5

“See what kind of love the Father has given to us, that we should be called children of God; and so we are. The reason why the world does no know us is that it did not know him. Beloved, we are God’s children now, and what we will be has not yet appeared; but we know that we shall be like him, because we shall see him as he is.” 1 John 3:1-2

If you want to read more about the subject of adoption from the pen of Dr. R. C. Sproul, then I recommend his book: Truths We Confess: A Systematic Exposition of the Westminster Confession of Faith, published by Reformation Trust Publishing, 2019. [See: pages 282-288]

— Dr. Marcus J. Serven

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2024 The Genevan Foundation

Theme by Anders Noren — Up ↑